Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.19 seconds)
Documents citing Pethu Aiyar vs M. Sankaranarayana Pillai And Ors. on 20 December, 1916

The Secretary Of State For India In ... vs Duggappa Bhandary And Ors. on 23 September, 1925

Anyhow, the Tahsildar issued the patta or kudtledar in Veeranna Shetti's name (see Ex. Q) and, therefore, he was justified in thinking that even the Government has no title. I, therefore, think that the defendants are also entitled to all improvements made on items 1 and 3 between 7th September 1898 the date of Ex. HH to May 1902 when the case about escheat was started. I may also observe that a patta was issued to Veeranna Shetti for it is observed in para. 6 of Ex. W: "It is on this purchase right that Veeranna Shetti happened to be kudtledar in Fasli 1312": vide N amy ana Aiyar v. Sankaranarayana Aiyar 24 Ind. Cas.
Madras High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 5 - Full Document

Secretary Of State vs Dugappa Bhandary And Ors. on 23 September, 1925

vide Naraycona Aiyar v. Sankaranarayana Aiyar [1914] 1 L.W. 369 and Durgozi Row v. Fakeer Sahib [1907] 30 Mad. 197. Where the improvements are effected by tenants their position is even better on the question as to whether they weren effected, bona fide. But, as the period is small and the question is of importance as to 'Item 1 only, I do not think it necessary to differ from the order proposed by my learned brother.
Madras High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1