Dipak Locharam Uttarradhi vs Chief Municipal Officer, Municipal ... on 7 September, 2021
1. Heard Ms Reddy, learned Counsel for the
petitioner. She submits that the impugned order could not
have been passed by the respondent no.1, in view of the
mandate of Section 28 (2) of the Contract Labour
(Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970, as it is an admitted
position that the petitioner is a labour contractor. She also
places reliance upon the decision of the learned Division
Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in M. Ganesh Vs.
South Central Railway, Secunderabad and others, 2003 (96)
FLR 897.