Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 29 (1.04 seconds)
Documents citing Union Of India vs R. B. Ch. Raghunath Singh & Co on 27 July, 1979

Mangla Kamla Homeopathic Medical ... vs The Union Of India & Ors on 3 January, 2019

15. These facts have been noted in view of submissions advanced by Mr. S.D. Sanjay, learned Additional Solicitor General of India, that the power to grant or deny permission to undertake admission vests in the Central Government, despite the Division Bench decision in the case of Union of India Vs. Dr. R.B.Singh (supra) having been set aside and the judgments of the Single-Judge Bench having been restored because, according to Mr. Sanjay, the Supreme Court did not go into the question of power of grant or denial of permission to undertake admission in the said judgments in the case of Temple of Hanemann Homeopathic Medical College and Hospital and others (supra), I reject the said submission at the very outset.
Patna High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 5 - C S Singh - Full Document

Dr. Yadurbir Sinha Hemeopathic Medical ... vs The Union Of India & Ors on 3 January, 2019

15. These facts have been noted in view of submissions advanced by Mr. S.D. Sanjay, learned Additional Solicitor General of India, that the power to grant or deny permission to undertake admission vests in the Central Government, despite the Division Bench decision in the case of Union of India Vs. Dr. R.B.Singh (supra) having been set aside and the judgments of the Single-Judge Bench having been restored because, according to Mr. Sanjay, the Supreme Court did not go into the question of power of grant or denial of permission to undertake admission in the said judgments in the case of Temple of Hanemann Homeopathic Medical College and Hospital and others (supra), I reject the said submission at the very outset.
Patna High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - C S Singh - Full Document

B. N. M. Homeopathic Medical College And ... vs The Union Of India & Ors on 3 January, 2019

15. These facts have been noted in view of submissions advanced by Mr. S.D. Sanjay, learned Additional Solicitor General of India, that the power to grant or deny permission to undertake admission vests in the Central Government, despite the Division Bench decision in the case of Union of India Vs. Dr. R.B.Singh (supra) having been set aside and the judgments of the Single-Judge Bench having been restored because, according to Mr. Sanjay, the Supreme Court did not go into the question of power of grant or denial of permission to undertake admission in the said judgments in the case of Temple of Hanemann Homeopathic Medical College and Hospital and others (supra), I reject the said submission at the very outset.
Patna High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - C S Singh - Full Document

Maharshi Menhi Homoeopathic Medical ... vs The Union Of India & Ors on 3 January, 2019

15. These facts have been noted in view of submissions advanced by Mr. S.D. Sanjay, learned Additional Solicitor General of India, that the power to grant or deny permission to undertake admission vests in the Central Government, despite the Division Bench decision in the case of Union of India Vs. Dr. R.B.Singh (supra) having been set aside and the judgments of the Single-Judge Bench having been restored because, according to Mr. Sanjay, the Supreme Court did not go into the question of power of grant or denial of permission to undertake admission in the said judgments in the case of Temple of Hanemann Homeopathic Medical College and Hospital and others (supra), I reject the said submission at the very outset.
Patna High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 4 - C S Singh - Full Document

Dr. R. B. Singh Gaya Homeopathic Medical ... vs The Union Of India & Ors on 4 January, 2019

15. These facts have been noted in view of submissions advanced by Mr. S.D. Sanjay, learned Additional Solicitor General of India, that the power to grant or deny permission to undertake admission vests in the Central Government, despite the Division Bench decision in the case of Union of India Vs. Dr. R.B.Singh (supra) having been set aside and the judgments of the Single-Judge Bench having been restored because, according to Mr. Sanjay, the Supreme Court did not go into the question of power of grant or denial of permission to undertake admission in the said judgments in the case of Temple of Hanemann Homeopathic Medical College and Hospital and others (supra), I reject the said submission at the very outset.
Patna High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - C S Singh - Full Document

Mangla Kamla Homeopathic Medical ... vs The Union Of India & Ors on 4 January, 2019

15. These facts have been noted in view of submissions advanced by Mr. S.D. Sanjay, learned Additional Solicitor General of India, that the power to grant or deny permission to undertake admission vests in the Central Government, despite the Division Bench decision in the case of Union of India Vs. Dr. R.B.Singh (supra) having been set aside and the judgments of the Single-Judge Bench having been restored because, according to Mr. Sanjay, the Supreme Court did not go into the question of power of grant or denial of permission to undertake admission in the said judgments in the case of Temple of Hanemann Homeopathic Medical College and Hospital and others (supra), I reject the said submission at the very outset.
Patna High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - C S Singh - Full Document

B. N. M. Homeopathic Medical College And ... vs The Union Of India & Ors on 4 January, 2019

15. These facts have been noted in view of submissions advanced by Mr. S.D. Sanjay, learned Additional Solicitor General of India, that the power to grant or deny permission to undertake admission vests in the Central Government, despite the Division Bench decision in the case of Union of India Vs. Dr. R.B.Singh (supra) having been set aside and the judgments of the Single-Judge Bench having been restored because, according to Mr. Sanjay, the Supreme Court did not go into the question of power of grant or denial of permission to undertake admission in the said judgments in the case of Temple of Hanemann Homeopathic Medical College and Hospital and others (supra), I reject the said submission at the very outset.
Patna High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - C S Singh - Full Document

Maharshi Menhi Homoeopathic Medical ... vs The Union Of India & Ors on 4 January, 2019

15. These facts have been noted in view of submissions advanced by Mr. S.D. Sanjay, learned Additional Solicitor General of India, that the power to grant or deny permission to undertake admission vests in the Central Government, despite the Division Bench decision in the case of Union of India Vs. Dr. R.B.Singh (supra) having been set aside and the judgments of the Single-Judge Bench having been restored because, according to Mr. Sanjay, the Supreme Court did not go into the question of power of grant or denial of permission to undertake admission in the said judgments in the case of Temple of Hanemann Homeopathic Medical College and Hospital and others (supra), I reject the said submission at the very outset.
Patna High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - C S Singh - Full Document

(Through Ld. Counsel Sh.I.S. Dahiya ) vs Union Of India on 25 January, 2008

RELIEF 13 In view of my findings on the above issues, the market value of the land in question is fixed @ Rs.11,800/- per bigha as on 13.11.1959 i.e. the date of notification u/sec. 4 of the LA Act. The LR of the deceased petitioner/Sh.Raghunath Prasad is entitled to enhancement in compensation of the acquired land 12 bearing khasra nos.697/442 min (2-0), 698/442 min (2-15) & 699/442 min (2-00) total measuring 6 bighas 15 biswas for jheel and the land comprised in khasra nos.697/442 min (0-8), 698/442 min (0-14) & 699/442 min (0-6) for Rasta total measuring 8 bighas 3 biswas of village Oldenpur, Delhi according to the statement U/s 19 of the LA Act forwarded by the LAC and also the award/ judgment dt. 31.05.2007 passed by this reference court in LAC No.10/2/07 titled UOI Vs Raghunath Prasad & Ors. in reference u/sec. 30-31 of the LA Act pertaining to the award no.6-A/1974-75 Suppl. The LR of the deceased petitioner shall also be entitled to interest on the enhanced compensation for the stay period. Besides it, the LR of the deceased petitioner shall also be entitled to get solatium U/s 23 (2) of the LA Act @ 30% on the enhanced amount of compensation and interest U/s 28 of the LA Act @ 9% per annum for the first year from the date of dispossession and @ 15% per annum on the difference between the enhanced compensation awarded by this court and the compensation awarded by the LAC for the subsequent period till the payment. Since, there is difference of more than three years between the notification U/sec. 4 dated 13.11.1959 and declaration U/sec. 6 of the Act dated 09.08.1966, the LR of the deceased petitioner is further entitled to get interest @ 6% p.a, on the market value w.e.f 13.11.1962 in terms of Section 4 (3) of the Land Acquisition (Amendment & Validation) Act, 1967 provided there is no 13 overlapping in the payment of interest U/sec. 4(3) and Section 28 of the Act.
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next