Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.88 seconds)
Documents citing The Oriental Insurance Company Limited vs R.Mahalingam R1 In Cma.2552/03 & on 30 August, 2012

R.Murali vs R.Shyamala on 19 December, 2013

In the Judgments reported in 2012 (1) TNMAC 216 [D.SHANMUGA ANAND vs. M.BALASUBRAMANIAN] and 2012 (2) TNMAC 750 [ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. vs. R.MAHALINGAM], following the earlier decisions of the Hon'ble Apex Court, appreciating the provisions of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 and the fact that the injured therein was a driver, held the disability to be total resulting in loss of 100% earning capacity. The case on hand is squarely covered by the above decisions.
Madras High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 2 - R Mahadevan - Full Document

A.M.Ibrahim vs M/S.Zigzag Solutions Private Limited on 7 January, 2014

11. As regards the interest on compensation, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that the interest for compensation amount would accrue 30 days after the date of the accident and not from the date of quantification/orders passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Labour. The decision of the Supreme Court has been followed by the Division Bench of this Court in the judgment reported in 2010 (2) TNMAC 80 (DB) cited above and the observation made in paragraph 27 of the said judgment reads as follows:
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - S Palanivelu - Full Document

The Branch Manager vs Prabhu on 12 April, 2016

In line with this intention, this Court in The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v Rajesh (CMA No.428/2016 dt.11/3/2016) had recently framed Guidelines for the conduct of trial proceedings and in the disbursal of compensation commending adoption of Direct Bank transfer to the bank accounts of the claimants/victims affording them an opportunity to take full control of the awards granted to them to manage their lives. We felt it was time to embrace technological change to dispense justice and meaningfully at that.
Madras High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - R Sudhakar - Full Document

The Branch Manager vs Prabhu on 12 April, 2016

In line with this intention, this Court in The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v Rajesh (CMA No.428/2016 dt.11/3/2016) had recently framed Guidelines for the conduct of trial proceedings and in the disbursal of compensation commending adoption of Direct Bank transfer to the bank accounts of the claimants/victims affording them an opportunity to take full control of the awards granted to them to manage their lives. We felt it was time to embrace technological change to dispense justice and meaningfully at that.
Madras High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - R Sudhakar - Full Document

Cholamandalam Ms General Insurance ... vs The Inspector Of Police on 12 September, 2017

No wonder, this Court, vide dated 20/7/2015 in Royal Sundaram Alliance Ins Co. Ltd. vs E Priya (CMA No. 1298/2015) and in Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Rajesh (CMA No. 428/2016 dated 11/3/2016), has mandated the use of Digital transfer or NEFT/RTGS transfer of compensation payable by insurance companies and transportations to be deposited into the accounts of the courts directly and also disbursement of compensation to claimants/victims also by a similar transfer to their bank accounts. The claimants are required to furnish as part of the claim documents, their bank account details and even PAN Card and Aadhaar details (where they are possessed of it) and this enables Direct Bank Transfer to the accounts of the claimants/victims. The claimants/victims get to handle the compensation sums by themselves and exercise full control of it, without fear of leakage which was rampant in this jurisdiction. In fact, this Court feels that be it a motor accident claim or a land acquisition claim or even a matrimonial dispute or any litigation involving the need for deposit and disbursement, time may have come to digitize the operations for easy and smooth transfer and an open, transparent regime. Sunlight, they say, is the sure and certain disinfectant. It may be a fit and proper circumstance for the Honble Chief Justice and Court administration to come up with a comprehensive directive for implementing this Direct Benefit or Bank transfer regime, across all jurisdictions involving and requiring similar deposit of sums and disbursement of it akin to motor accident claim jurisdiction and also expedite the E-court Fee regime and possibly an E filing of cases too. This suggestion is placed with utmost respect before the Honble Chief Justice for appropriate consideration.
Madras High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 4 - P N Prakash - Full Document

The Sbi General Insurance Co. Ltd., ... vs Vishal Dinkar Ingle And Others on 22 January, 2026

18. At the same time, we find that the view taken by the learned single Judge in the case of Smt. Afroz Janha (supra), based on the judgments of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of National Insurance Co. Ltd. ..vs.. Ramkishore Mishra , reported in 2012 III CLR 371 and another case of Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. ..vs.. R. Mahalingam , reported in 2012 III CLR 508, is not the correct view and hence, cannot be accepted.
Bombay High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - A S Kilor - Full Document
1   2 Next