Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.60 seconds)

S.Mahalingam vs Vasan Publications Pvt. Ltd

18. Learned counsel for the plaintiff also stated that the argument of the defendant regarding non-joinder of parties, is not a plea taken in the written statement and no issues also were framed in this suit in that regard. Even otherwise, it is settled law that the copyright infringement suit at the instance of one of the owners of the copyright, is maintainable as a co-owner and all owners Page No.31/78 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S.(Comm.Div).No.522 of 2012 need not join in filing the suit and in this regard, learned counsel relied on the decision reported in MANU/GH/0627/2018 (Deepak Kumar Sanyal and others Vs. Naba Kanta Bardolio and others). Moreover, Section 61 of the copyright Act relied on by the defendants, does not apply to the case on hand, because Section 61 pertains only to a copyright infringement suit instituted by an exclusive licensee, which is not a case in this suit.
Madras High Court Cites 32 - Cited by 0 - P Velmurugan - Full Document
1