Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.28 seconds)
Documents citing K.Mohanarangan vs Nil on 22 July, 2022

S.Tharanya vs Nil on 21 July, 2023

5. The learned counsel for the petitioners has further relied upon a decision of the Madras High Court (Principal Seat of this Court), Chennai in the case of K.Mohanarangan and others Vs. Nil, reported in 2022 (3) MWN (Civil) 653, wherein, the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the above case of Amardeep Singh was referred and it was observed that “The whole object of giving the cooling period is to just to give an opportunity to the couples to recall their good old days and iron out the differences by valuing the relationship and re-unite. When the subsistence of marriage is seen as a burden and does not link with the emotional, sexual and physical well-being of the couples and all other attendant circumstances of their life, the marriage will naturally loose its life and there cannot be any scope for reunion of the couples between whom there is love lost and life lost.”
Madras High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Karthikeyan vs Nil on 22 August, 2023

7. The Madras High Court (Principal Seat of this Court), Chennai in the case of K.Mohanarangan and others Vs. Nil, reported in 2022 (3) MWN (Civil) 653 by relying the above decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Amardeep Singh has observed that “The whole object of giving the cooling period is to just to give an opportunity to the couples to recall their good old _____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No. 3 of 6 C.R.P.(MD) No.2080 of 2023 days and iron out the differences by valuing the relationship and re-unite. When the subsistence of marriage is seen as a burden and does not link with the emotional, sexual and physical well-being of the couples and all other attendant circumstances of their life, the marriage will naturally loose its life and there cannot be any scope for reunion of the couples between whom there is love lost and life lost.”
Madras High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Karthikeyan vs Nil on 22 August, 2023

7. The Madras High Court (Principal Seat of this Court), Chennai in the case of K.Mohanarangan and others Vs. Nil, reported in 2022 (3) MWN (Civil) 653 by relying the above decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Amardeep Singh has observed that “The whole object of giving the cooling period is to just to give an opportunity to the couples to recall their good old _____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No. 3 of 6 C.R.P.(MD) No.2080 of 2023 days and iron out the differences by valuing the relationship and re-unite. When the subsistence of marriage is seen as a burden and does not link with the emotional, sexual and physical well-being of the couples and all other attendant circumstances of their life, the marriage will naturally loose its life and there cannot be any scope for reunion of the couples between whom there is love lost and life lost.”
Madras High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

N.R.Subash vs Nil on 11 September, 2023

5. It is further submitted that the Madras High Court (Principal Seat of this Court), Chennai in the case of K.Mohanarangan and others Vs. Nil, reported in 2022 (3) MWN (Civil) 653 by relying the above decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Amardeep Singh has observed that “The whole object of giving the cooling period is to just to give an opportunity to the couples to recall their good old days and iron out the differences by valuing the relationship and re-unite. When the subsistence of marriage is seen as a burden and does not link with the emotional, sexual and physical well-being of the couples and all other attendant circumstances of their life, the marriage will naturally loose its life and there cannot be any scope for reunion of the couples between whom there is love lost and life lost.”
Madras High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sathappan vs Nil on 26 September, 2023

8. The Madras High Court (Principal Seat of this Court), Chennai in the case of K.Mohanarangan and others Vs. Nil, reported in 2022 (3) MWN (Civil) 653 by relying the above decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Amardeep Singh has observed that “The whole object of giving the cooling period is to just to give an opportunity to the couples to recall their good old days and iron out the differences by valuing the relationship and re-unite. When the subsistence of marriage is seen as a burden and does not link with _____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No. 3 of 6 C.R.P.(MD) No.2352 of 2023 the emotional, sexual and physical well-being of the couples and all other attendant circumstances of their life, the marriage will naturally loose its life and there cannot be any scope for reunion of the couples between whom there is love lost and life lost.”
Madras High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M.Jayaraman vs Nil

5. The Hon’ble Supreme Court, having held that six months cooling period is only directory and not mandatory, the Courts have to necessarily taking into account various factors to decide whether the cooling period of six months can be waived. In fact, this Court in CRP. No.2016 of 2022, in the case of K.Mohanarangan and another Vs. Nil by order dated 22.07.2022, relying on the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Amardeep Singh's case, (referred herein supra) waived the cooling periods.
Madras High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1