Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.21 seconds)

Sukhdev Singh vs Delhi State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) on 1 September, 2003

Cases 518) As was observed by this Court in Atmendra vs. State of Karnataka (1998 (4) SCC 256), to claim the benefit of the provisions of Section 80, it has to be shown (1) that the act in question was without any criminal intention or knowledge; (2) that the act was being done in lawful manner and by lawful means; (3) that the act was being done with proper care and caution. In the said case it was observed that the evidence established that the accused unintentionally fired the gun and, therefore, the question of applying Section 80 did not arise.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 64 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Sukhdev Singh vs Delhi State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) on 1 September, 2003

Cases 518) As was observed by this Court in Atmendra vs. State of Karnataka (1998 (4) SCC 256), to claim the benefit of the provisions of Section 80, it has to be shown (1) that the act in question was without any criminal intention or knowledge; (2) that the act was being done in lawful manner and by lawful means; (3) that the act was being done with proper care and caution. In the said case it was observed that the evidence established that the accused unintentionally fired the gun and, therefore, the question of applying Section 80 did not arise.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1