Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1276 (0.85 seconds)
Documents citing Hitesh Verma vs The State Of Uttarakhand on 5 November, 2020

Bipin Bihari Singh @ Bipin Singh @ Vipin ... vs The State Of Bihar on 31 March, 2026

In a case of Hitesh Verma v. State of Uttarakhand and another (supra), the Hon'ble Supreme Court in paragraph 23 has referred a judgment rendered in Ishwar Pratap Singh v. State of U.P. in which the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that there is no prohibition under the law for quashing the charge-sheet in part. During course of investigation, the victim along with other witnesses have supported the prosecution story that the informant was assaulted.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - A K Sinha - Full Document

Dr. Hiralal Konar & Anr vs The State Of West Bengal And Anr on 3 September, 2025

31. Accordingly, this Court, while placing reliance on the aforesaid judgments of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Hitesh Verma v. State of 2 (2020) 10 SCC 710 3 (2018) 5 SCC 435 26 2025:CHC-AS:1716 Uttarakhand and Sudhakar v. State, finds it appropriate to interfere under Section 482 Cr.P.C., as the continuation of proceedings before the learned Trial Court, in respect of the alleged offence under Sections 3(1)(u) of the SCs/STs (POA) Act, would amount to an abuse of process of law. The allegations do not meet the statutory requirement of having been committed in public view, and therefore, no prima facie case is made out under the said provisions.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dr. Hiralal Konar & Anr vs The State Of West Bengal And Anr on 3 September, 2025

31. Accordingly, this Court, while placing reliance on the aforesaid judgments of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Hitesh Verma v. State of 2 (2020) 10 SCC 710 3 (2018) 5 SCC 435 26 2025:CHC-AS:1716 Uttarakhand and Sudhakar v. State, finds it appropriate to interfere under Section 482 Cr.P.C., as the continuation of proceedings before the learned Trial Court, in respect of the alleged offence under Sections 3(1)(u) of the SCs/STs (POA) Act, would amount to an abuse of process of law. The allegations do not meet the statutory requirement of having been committed in public view, and therefore, no prima facie case is made out under the said provisions.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Abdul Halim vs The State Of Jharkhand on 7 November, 2023

"1. The challenge in the present appeal is to an order passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital on 20-7- 2020 [Hitesh Verma v. State of Uttarakhand, 2020 SCC OnLine Utt 356] whereby the petition filed by the appellant under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ("the Code") for quashing the charge-sheet as well as the summoning order dated 25-6-2020 was dismissed.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 40 - Cited by 0 - S K Dwivedi - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next