Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.23 seconds)

Dr. Harihar Nath Garg vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 7 March, 2017

5. On the other hand, the learned counsel for respondent no.2 submits that he is a social worker and some false case filed against him will not deter him from performing his social obligation of bringing malpractices for violation of the provisions of the PC-PNDT Act. He also submits that in fact respondent no.2 has been acquitted from the charges of rape as were levelled on him and submits that he had examined three persons including CMHO of Bhind in favour of his complaint and after taking into consideration the statements of three witnesses, a private complaint has been registered by CJM Bhind taking cognizance of the offences under Sections 23 (1) and 23 (3) of the PC-PNDT Act. Learned counsel for respondent no.2 has placed reliance on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of K.K. Singhal & Others v. Steel Strips Ltd. as reported in 2015 (1) CCSC 477 (SC), wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court had upheld the decision of the lower Court in 4 M.Cr.C. No.13583/2016 (Dr. Harihar Nath Garg v. State of MP & Others) dismissing the proceedings under Section 482, Cr.P.C. for quashing the complaint under the provisions of Sections 417, 418 and 420 read with Section 120 of IPC. He submits that since respondent no.2 has filed a revision before the Sessions Court against the order of taking cognizance, whereby the learned CJM has refused to take cognizance under the provisions of Sections 420, 467, 471 and 120B of IPC, therefore the proper way for the petitioner would have been to approach the revisional Court rather than approaching this Court under its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482, Cr.P.C. He submits that prima-facie, the case is made out and there is gross violation of the provisions of the PC-PNDT Act inasmuch as Section 4(3) provides that no pre- natal diagnostic techniques shall be used or conducted unless the person qualified to do so is satisfied for reasons to be recorded in writing that any of the following conditions are fulfilled, namely :-
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1