Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 82 (7.78 seconds)
Documents citing Shri V.S. Krishnan & Ors vs M/S Westfort Hi-Tech Hospital Ltd. & Ors on 21 February, 2008

Prudence Anthony Maynard And Anr vs Mundhra Container Freight Station Pvt. ... on 11 April, 2017

240. Supreme Court in the cases of Purnima Manthena & Anr. vs. Ranuka Datla & Ors. (supra) and V.S. Krishnan & Ors. vs. Westfort Hi-Tech Hospital Ltd. & Ors. (supra) has dealt with the powers of the Company Court under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 and has held that the findings of fact cannot be interfered with by this Court under Section 10-F of the Companies Act, 1956 unless the order passed by the Company Law Board demonstrate perversity or arbitrariness and only if the question of law arises for consideration. In this case, the Company Law Board has rendered various findings of facts which are not perverse or arbitrary and in view of the fact that no question of law arises in these appeals, filed under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956, the same cannot be entertained on that ground also.
Bombay High Court Cites 63 - Cited by 0 - R D Dhanuka - Full Document

Prudence Maynard vs Punjab Terminals Private Limited on 11 April, 2017

240. Supreme Court in the cases of Purnima Manthena & Anr. vs. Ranuka Datla & Ors. (supra) and V.S. Krishnan & Ors. vs. Westfort Hi-Tech Hospital Ltd. & Ors. (supra) has dealt with the powers of the Company Court under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 and has held that the findings of fact cannot be interfered with by this Court under Section 10-F of the Companies Act, 1956 unless the order passed by the Company Law Board demonstrate perversity or arbitrariness and only if the question of law arises for consideration. In this case, the Company Law Board has rendered various findings of facts which are not perverse or arbitrary and in view of the fact that no question of law arises in these appeals, filed under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956, the same cannot be entertained on that ground also.
Bombay High Court Cites 63 - Cited by 0 - R D Dhanuka - Full Document

Prudence Maynar And Another vs Mundhra Container Freight Station Pvt. ... on 11 April, 2017

240. Supreme Court in the cases of Purnima Manthena & Anr. vs. Ranuka Datla & Ors. (supra) and V.S. Krishnan & Ors. vs. Westfort Hi-Tech Hospital Ltd. & Ors. (supra) has dealt with the powers of the Company Court under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 and has held that the findings of fact cannot be interfered with by this Court under Section 10-F of the Companies Act, 1956 unless the order passed by the Company Law Board demonstrate perversity or arbitrariness and only if the question of law arises for consideration. In this case, the Company Law Board has rendered various findings of facts which are not perverse or arbitrary and in view of the fact that no question of law arises in these appeals, filed under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956, the same cannot be entertained on that ground also.
Bombay High Court Cites 63 - Cited by 0 - R D Dhanuka - Full Document

Prudence Maynard vs Punjab Terminals Pvt. Ltd on 11 April, 2017

240. Supreme Court in the cases of Purnima Manthena & Anr. vs. Ranuka Datla & Ors. (supra) and V.S. Krishnan & Ors. vs. Westfort Hi-Tech Hospital Ltd. & Ors. (supra) has dealt with the powers of the Company Court under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 and has held that the findings of fact cannot be interfered with by this Court under Section 10-F of the Companies Act, 1956 unless the order passed by the Company Law Board demonstrate perversity or arbitrariness and only if the question of law arises for consideration. In this case, the Company Law Board has rendered various findings of facts which are not perverse or arbitrary and in view of the fact that no question of law arises in these appeals, filed under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956, the same cannot be entertained on that ground also.
Bombay High Court Cites 63 - Cited by 0 - R D Dhanuka - Full Document

Prudence Maynard vs Mundhra Container Freight Station Pvt ... on 11 April, 2017

240. Supreme Court in the cases of Purnima Manthena & Anr. vs. Ranuka Datla & Ors. (supra) and V.S. Krishnan & Ors. vs. Westfort Hi-Tech Hospital Ltd. & Ors. (supra) has dealt with the powers of the Company Court under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 and has held that the findings of fact cannot be interfered with by this Court under Section 10-F of the Companies Act, 1956 unless the order passed by the Company Law Board demonstrate perversity or arbitrariness and only if the question of law arises for consideration. In this case, the Company Law Board has rendered various findings of facts which are not perverse or arbitrary and in view of the fact that no question of law arises in these appeals, filed under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956, the same cannot be entertained on that ground also.
Bombay High Court Cites 63 - Cited by 0 - R D Dhanuka - Full Document

Prudence Maynard And Anr vs Mundhra Container Freight Station Pvt ... on 11 April, 2017

240. Supreme Court in the cases of Purnima Manthena & Anr. vs. Ranuka Datla & Ors. (supra) and V.S. Krishnan & Ors. vs. Westfort Hi-Tech Hospital Ltd. & Ors. (supra) has dealt with the powers of the Company Court under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 and has held that the findings of fact cannot be interfered with by this Court under Section 10-F of the Companies Act, 1956 unless the order passed by the Company Law Board demonstrate perversity or arbitrariness and only if the question of law arises for consideration. In this case, the Company Law Board has rendered various findings of facts which are not perverse or arbitrary and in view of the fact that no question of law arises in these appeals, filed under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956, the same cannot be entertained on that ground also.
Bombay High Court Cites 63 - Cited by 0 - R D Dhanuka - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next