Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.36 seconds)

Tushar D. Bhatt vs State Of Gujarat on 14 May, 2004

Obviously, therefore, the said judgment has been passed by the Apex Court on the facts and circumstances of that case. It is on the contrary very specifically laid down that there cannot be any straight jacket formula which could be applied for this purpose. Every case as such is required to be considered on its facts and it is to be found out in what circumstances and in which environment the delinquent used abusive language. As already stated above, it is not only because of the intemperate language the petitioner is sought to be penalized, but also for the purpose for which it was used and that factor was kept in the view while deciding the quantum of punishment. In the cases referred to above, abusive language appears to have been used by the concerned delinquent in a heat of moment on the spot as and when the concerned event took place. In the present case, it is not so. It has been used for similar purpose by the petitioner almost calling upon his superior officer that if you did not grant my demand, you would be totally ruined. It is that attitude which is required to be viewed with seriousness.
Gujarat High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

T. Mrugapani vs A.P. State Co-Operative Bank And Ors. on 26 June, 2003

15. However, in Ramkishan v. U.O.I., , the Supreme Court has taken a different view. Not only it was held that in the event of disagreement with the findings of the Enquiry Officer, the disciplinary authority should issue a notice to the delinquent, but also such notice should contain reasons on the basis of which the disciplinary authority proposes to differ with the findings of the Enquiry Officer. It was observed as under:
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - L N Reddy - Full Document

The Vice President vs Sri K M Devaiah on 25 January, 2018

In the case of RAMKISHAN V. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. [1996 (I) LLJ 982], the Hon'ble Supreme Court has clearly opined that even if the allegation is that an abusive language has been used against a superior officer, no straightjacket formula can be evolved as to when an abusive language would warrant dismissal from service. While assessing abusive language, and its impact, one has to see the circumstances in which it may have been uttered, the character of the person, and the other circumstances surrounding the alleged incident.
Karnataka High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - R S Chauhan - Full Document
1