Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.20 seconds)

North West Karnataka Road Transport ... vs Kulsumbi on 7 September, 2010

7. Per contra, ,--.1earVnCCi':-. eo_U.nse'I'~...foi" the respondent--c}aimants siib'n1.'1t_s§jchat.d_'*ien"'-View of the decision repor_ted&:'---in .:A:C_:JVVV'1':?V§'>9 (Gujarat State vs. Hathibhai Senghabhqi others) the claimants are e11t_itIed°~,to' Vc'E_aAi:f1Veompensation under the eté§"L1--i:Ader Section 166 of M.V.Act. of the arguments addressed by ddv'--x.the I'eet'fnevd."e'odnse1s for the parties, the foilowing
Karnataka High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Tata Aig General Insurance Co. Ltd vs Alkaben Wd/O Dhirajbhai Kuberbhai ... on 24 January, 2019

(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.THAKER) Heard learned advocate for applicant. Considered impugned award and also considered provision under Section 167 of the Motor Vehicles Act and the provisions under Workmen's Compensation Act as well as judgment in case of Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation v. Hathibhai Senghabhai Ruppura and Ors.
Gujarat High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - K M Thaker - Full Document
1