Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 20 (0.50 seconds)
Documents citing Bal Ram (Shri) And Ors. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 26 March, 2003

Sh. Daya Nand vs Union Of India on 23 September, 2008

13 The counsel for the petitioners, in support of his case, has proved on record the attested copies of khasra Girdawaries for the year 1995 to 2004 pertaining to village Burari, Delhi which have been exhibited as Ex.PW1/1 (colly) in the affidavit of Sh. Onkar Singh Tyagi/ petitioner no.2 filed on 18.03.2008. However, the counsel for the petitioners has further adopted the same evidence as led in the similar reference i.e. in LAC No.226/1/07 titled Raj Bal Vs UOI and has also relied upon the judgment dt. 14.07.2008 passed by this reference court in LAC No.226/1/07 titled Raj Bal & Ors. Vs UOI which is Ex.C-1. The counsel for the respondents have proved in evidence the award in question as Ex.R-1, copies of sale deeds Mark-A, Ex.R/X-1 to Ex.R/X-3.
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Shyam Lal S/O Late Sh. Bhuley vs Union Of India Through on 23 December, 2008

It was further held by this reference court in Raj Bal case that the petitioners therein were also entitled to compounded increase @ 11.5% annually on the compensation amount of Rs.15.70 lacs per acre fixed by this reference court of the land therein as per their shares from 09.08.2001 till the date of acquisition of the land i.e. 18.07.2003 which 9 roughly comes to the total enhanced compensation of Rs.19,20,568/- per acre (total amount fixed at Rs.19,20,568/- per acre - Rs.5,05,000/- per acre assessed by the LAC = Rs.14,15,568/- per acre enhanced) as on 18.07.2003.
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

(Through Ld. Counsel Sh. Deepak Khosla ) vs Union Of India on 30 August, 2008

cultivation prior or even after the date of notification u/sec. 4 of the LA Act. The counsel for the petitioner has also adopted the same evidence as led in the similar reference i.e. in LAC No.226/1/07 titled Raj Bal Vs UOI and has relied upon the judgment dt. 14.07.2008 passed by this reference court in LAC No.226/1/07 titled Raj Bal & Ors. Vs UOI. The counsel for the respondents have proved in evidence the award in question as Ex.R-1 and further relied upon the evidence led by the respondents in the aforesaid case of Raj Bal.
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Braham Prakash vs Union Of India & Ors on 20 September, 2008

13 The petitioners, in support of their case, have examined Sh.Kishan Pal as PW1. PW1 has not proved on record any document by way of his affidavit in evidence. The counsel for the petitioners has proved in evidence the attested copy of khatoni for the year 1993-94 pertaining to village Burari, Delhi as Ex.P-1 which reveals that the land bearing khasra nos.114/6/2 (4-00), 14 (4-16), 15 (4-16), 16 (4-16), 17 (4-16), 25 (4-16) & 126/16/3 (2-15) total measuring 30 bighas 15 biswas is recorded in the name of Chandru & Hari Singh - sons of Gokal Chand and the date of commencement of bhumidhari right is also shown as 1980-81. The petitioners' names have been entered in the column of change of the khatedar/ recorded owners. Perusal of the statement u/sec. 19 of the LA Act forwarded by the LAC reveals that the compensation of the land in question was assessed in the name of petitioners herein, meaning thereby, the petitioners were the owners of the land in question at the time of acquisition. However, the counsel for the petitioners has further adopted the same evidence as led in the similar reference i.e. in LAC No.226/1/07 12 titled Raj Bal Vs UOI and has also filed & relied upon the judgment dt. 14.07.2008 passed by this reference court in LAC No.226/1/07 titled Raj Bal & Ors. Vs UOI.
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

(Through Ld. Counsel Sh. Deepak Khosla ) vs Union Of India on 12 September, 2008

11 The counsel for the petitioner, in support of his case, has proved on record the attested copies of khasra Girdawaries for the year 2000 to 2004 pertaining to village Burari, Delhi as Ex.P­1 (colly) which reveals that the land in question was under cultivation prior & even after the date of notification u/sec. 4 of the LA Act. The counsel for the petitioner has also adopted the same evidence as led in the similar reference i.e. in LAC No.226/1/07 titled Raj Bal Vs UOI and has filed & relied upon the judgment dt. 14.07.2008 passed by this reference court in LAC No.226/1/07 titled Raj Bal & Ors. Vs UOI. The counsel for the respondents have proved in evidence the award in question as Ex.R­1 and further relied upon the evidence led by the respondents in the aforesaid case of Raj Bal.
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Ishwar Chand ] Sons Of Sh. Ram Dutt vs Union Of India Through on 10 September, 2008

14 The counsel for the petitioners, in support of his case, has proved on record the certified copies of khasra Girdawaries for the year 2004 to 06 which are Ex.P­1 & Ex.P­2 respectively and also the attested copies of khasra Girdawaries for the year 2000 to 2004 running into 11 pages collectively which are Ex.P­3 which reveals that the land in question was under cultivation prior or even after the date of notification u/sec. 4 of the LA Act. The counsel for the petitioners has also proved the certified copies of relevant pages of the field book for the year 1980­81 running into 7 pages collectively which is Ex.P­4. However, the counsel for the petitioners has further adopted the same evidence as led in the similar reference i.e. in LAC No.226/1/07 titled Raj Bal Vs UOI and has also filed & relied upon the judgment dt. 14.07.2008 passed by this reference court in LAC No.226/1/07 titled Raj Bal & Ors. Vs UOI. The counsel for the respondents have proved in 14 evidence the award in question as Ex.R­1, copies of sale deeds Mark­A, Ex.R/X­1 to Ex.R/X­3.
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Anand vs Union Of India on 28 November, 2008

12 Sh.Anand/ petitioner no.1 has examined himself as PW1. PW1 has proved in evidence the khatoni pertaining to village Burari, Delhi for the year 1993-94 which is Ex.PW1/1 which shows entry in the column nos.7 to 11 for ordering change of the petitioners' names in place of Bhagwanti W/o Sh.Kripa Nand who is shown as the recorded owner. Meaning thereby, the land in question has been mutated in the name of the petitionrs according to their shares. PW1, during his cross examination, has denied the suggestion that his land was not fertile. PW1 has also denied the suggestion that two crops of Rabi and Kharif and one crop of vegetables were not sown in the land in question. PW1 has further denied the suggestion that the land in question is low laying area and logged with water. PW1 has denied all the suggestions so on. However, PW1 has deposed that this land has never been prone to flood and there is pusta near his land but PW1 does not know to which direction of the Pusta, his land situates. The petitioners have also filed & relied upon the photocopy of the judgment dt.14.07.2008 passed by this reference court in LAC No.226/1/07 titled Raj Bal & Ors. Vs UOI which is Mark-A. The counsel for the respondents have proved in evidence the award in question as Ex.R-1, copies of sale deeds Mark-A to Mark-D. In Raj Bal case (supra), the land situate at village Burari, 12 Delhi was acquired vide the same notification dt.18.07.2003 u/sec. 4 of the LA Act, whereby this court thoroughly considered the materials placed on record i.e. the sale deeds relied upon and the evidence led by the parties and held that the petitioners' land is the agricultural land and petitioners therein are entitled to uniform compensation for the land under acquisition at Rs.15.70 lacs per acre i.e. the rate assessed by the LAC for category-A land.
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

( Through Ld. Counsel Ms. Ranjana Doshi ) vs Union Of India on 19 November, 2008

10 The petitioner, in support of his case, has proved in evidence the documents i.e. tube well bill and installation charges bill as Ex.PW1/1 & Ex.PW1-A, photocopy of sale deed as Ex.PW1/2 (Original seen & returned), fard/ khasra girdawaries as Ex.PW1/3 and the copy 8 of the invoices for purchase of seeds & plantation as Ex.PW1/4. The respondents have not filed any document to prove on record that the land in question is not the agricultural land except relying upon the award in question and sale deeds. During cross examination, PW1 has denied the suggestion that the land in question was not the growing crops. However, it was volunteered by PW1 that the land in question is one of the best fertile land in Delhi according to the report given by the Horticulture Department. The petitioner has further filed and relied upon the photocopy of certified copy of judgment dt.14.07.2008 passed by this reference court in LAC No.226/1/07 titled Raj Bal & Ors Vs. UOI as Mark-A. In Raj Bal case (supra), the land situate at village Burari, Delhi was acquired vide the same notification dt.18.07.2003 u/sec. 4 of the LA Act, whereby this court thoroughly considered the materials placed on record i.e. the sale deeds relied upon and the evidence led by the parties and held that the petitioners' land is the agricultural land and petitioners therein are entitled to uniform compensation for the land under acquisition at Rs.15.70 lacs per acre i.e. the rate assessed by the LAC for category-A land.
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

( Through Ld. Counsel Ms. Vijay Laxmi ) vs Union Of India on 24 December, 2008

13 The counsel for the petitioner, in support of her evidence, has relied upon the photocopy of the certified copy of the judgment 11 dt.14.07.2008 passed by this reference court in LAC No.226/1/07 titled Raj Bal & Ors. Vs UOI which is Mark-X. The counsel for the respondents have proved in evidence the award in question as Ex.R-1, copies of sale deeds Mark-A to Mark-D. In Raj Bal case (supra), the land situate at village Burari, Delhi was acquired vide the same notification dt.18.07.2003 u/sec. 4 of the LA Act, whereby this court thoroughly considered the materials placed on record i.e. the sale deeds relied upon and the evidence led by the parties and held that the petitioners' land is the agricultural land and petitioners therein are entitled to uniform compensation for the land under acquisition at Rs.15.70 lacs per acre i.e. the rate assessed by the LAC for category-A land.
Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next