Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.30 seconds)
Documents citing Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. vs Smt. Anju Khare Widow Of Late Shree Kumar ... on 10 April, 2007

Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. vs Puspa Devi And Ors. on 5 February, 2008

Moreover, from the composite reading of Jyotsnaben Sudhirbhai Patel (Supra), Nicolletta Rohtagi and Ors. (Supra) and Smt. Manju and Ors. (Supra) we are of the view that an insurance company is entitled to know the reason of allowing or rejection of application under Section 170 of the Act by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and can challenge the order of rejection, if any, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Therefore, the insurance company can not be said to be remediless.
Allahabad High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 1 - A Lala - Full Document

Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. ... vs Puspa Devi W/O Pyare Lal, Pyare Lal S/O ... on 5 February, 2008

Moreover, from the composite reading of Jyotsnaben Sudhirbhai Patel (Supra), Nicolletta Rohtagi and Ors. (Supra) and Smt. Manju and Ors. (Supra) we are of the view that an insurance company is entitled to know the reason of allowing or rejection of application under Section 170 of the Act by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and can challenge the order of rejection, if any, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Therefore, the insurance company can not be said to be remediless.
Allahabad High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - A Lala - Full Document

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Smt. Paanwati & Another on 6 January, 2010

This appeal has been preferred by the insurance company on the ground of quantum in spite of rejection of application under section 170 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 which, according to us, this Court report in 2007 (4) ADJ 101 ( Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Smt. Manju and others) and of the Supreme Court reported i n AIR 2002 SC 3350 ( National Insurance Co. ltd. Chandigarh Vs. Nicolleta Rohtagi and others). Therefore, the appeal can not be admitted and is dismissed at the stage of admission without imposing any cost.
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - R A Singh - Full Document

United India Insurance Co.Ltd. vs Smt. Geeta And Others on 6 January, 2010

This appeal has been preferred by the insurance company on the ground of quantum in spite of rejection of application under section 170 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 which, according to us, this Court report in 2007 (4) ADJ 101 ( Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Smt. Manju and others) and of the Supreme Court reported i n AIR 2002 SC 3350 ( National Insurance Co. ltd. Chandigarh Vs. Nicolleta Rohtagi and others). Therefore, the appeal can not be admitted and is dismissed at the stage of admission without imposing any cost.
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - R A Singh - Full Document

National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Om Prakash Vishwakarma And Others on 6 January, 2010

This appeal has been preferred by the insurance company on the ground of quantum in spite of rejection of application under section 170 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 which, according to us, this Court report in 2007 (4) ADJ 101 ( Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Smt. Manju and others) and of the Supreme Court reported i n AIR 2002 SC 3350 ( National Insurance Co. ltd. Chandigarh Vs. Nicolleta Rohtagi and others). Therefore, the appeal can not be admitted and is dismissed at the stage of admission without imposing any cost.
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - R A Singh - Full Document

The New India Assurance Company Ltd. vs Rambabu Gupta & Others on 6 January, 2010

This appeal has been preferred by the insurance company on the ground of quantum in spite of rejection of application under section 170 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 which, according to us, this Court report in 2007 (4) ADJ 101 ( Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Smt. Manju and others) and of the Supreme Court reported i n AIR 2002 SC 3350 ( National Insurance Co. ltd. Chandigarh Vs. Nicolleta Rohtagi and others). Therefore, the appeal can not be admitted and is dismissed at the stage of admission without imposing any cost.
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - R A Singh - Full Document

National Insurance Company Ltd. vs Smt. Santosh Kumari @ Shanti Kumari And ... on 4 February, 2010

This appeal has been preferred by the insurance company on the ground of quantum in spite of rejection of application under Section 170 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 which, according to us, is not maintainable in view of the judgments of this Court reported in 2007 (4) ADJ 101 (Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Smt. Manju and others) and of the Supreme Court reported in AIR 2002 SC 3350 (National Insurance Co. Ltd., Chandigarh Vs. Nicolleta Rohtagi and others). Therefore, the appeal can not be admitted and is dismissed at the stage of admission without imposing any cost. Incidentally, the appellant-insurance company prayed that the statutory deposit of Rs. 25,000/- made before this Court for preferring this appeal be remitted back to the concerned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal as expeditiously as possible in order to adjust the same with the amount of compensation to be paid to the claimants, however, such prayer is allowed. Order Date :- 4.2.2010 RKS/
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - R A Singh - Full Document

The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. vs Ram Avtar And Another on 21 January, 2010

This appeal has been preferred by the Oriental Insurance Company on the ground of quantum in spite of rejection of application under section 170 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 which, according to us, this Court report in 2007 (4) ADJ 101 (Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Smt. Manju and others) and of the Supreme Court reported in AIR 2002 SC 3350 (National Insurance Company Limited Chandigarh Vs. Nicolleta Rohtagi and others). Therefore, the appeal cannot be admitted and is dismissed at the stage of admission without imposing any cost.
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - R A Singh - Full Document
1