citedby: 112896520

1 - 10 of 1496 (0.96 seconds)

Documents citing Registrar Of Companies & Ors vs Dharmendra Kumar Garg & Anr on 1 June, 2012

The Registrar, Supreme Court Of India vs R S Misra on 21 November, 2017

77. A Co-ordinate Bench of this on an identical question of law, as involved in the present case, passed strictures against the same learned CIC, who passed the present impugned order. The relevant portion of the observations of the co-ordinate Bench in Registrar of Companies v. Dharmender Kumar Garg (supra), are reproduced hereinbelow:-

Delhi High Court Cites 59 - Cited by 5 - Manmohan - Full Document

Krishna Deo Prasad Sahu vs Niti Aayog on 7 August, 2025

In this regard reference is apposite to the view expressed by the coordinate Bench of this Court in Registrar of Companies and Ors vs Dharmendra Kumar Garg and Anr, 2012 SCC OnLine Del 3263. Same read as under:

Central Information Commission Cites 31 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Deepa vs University Of Delhi on 30 August, 2019

She further submitted that the decision of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in Registrar of Companies & Ors vs Dharmendra Kumar Garg & Ors (WP(C) 11271/2009 decided on 01.06.2012 was decided during the currency of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of CBSE vs Aditya Bandopadhyaya & Ors, Civil Appeal no. 6454/2011.

Central Information Commission Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - V N Sarna - Full Document

Arun vs Industries And Commerce on 22 July, 2025

48. Now, being Complaint under Section 18 of the RTI Act, the facts of the case do not warrant any action under Section 18(2) of the RTI Act against the CPIO as it does not bear any mala fides or an intention to deliberately obstruct the access to information as alleged by the Complainant. Here, it is relevant to quote a judgment of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the matter of Registrar of Companies & Ors v. Dharmendra Kumar Garg & Anr. [W.P.(C) 11271/2009] dated 01.06.2012 wherein it was held:

Central Information Commission Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ehtesham Qutubuddin Siddiqui vs Department Of Justice on 24 June, 2019

8. The Commission, after hearing the submissions of both the parties and perusing the records, notes that the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Registrar of Companies & Ors. Vs. Dharmendra Kumar Garg & Ors. [W.P.(C) 11271/2009] had observed:

Central Information Commission Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Arun vs Ut Of Puducherry on 22 July, 2025

48. Now, being Complaint under Section 18 of the RTI Act, the facts of the case do not warrant any action under Section 18(2) of the RTI Act against the CPIO as it does not bear any mala fides or an intention to deliberately obstruct the access to information as alleged by the Complainant. Here, it is relevant to quote a judgment of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the matter of Registrar of Companies & Ors v. Dharmendra Kumar Garg & Anr. [W.P.(C) 11271/2009] dated 01.06.2012 wherein it was held:

Central Information Commission Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Radha Raman Tripathy vs Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca) , ... on 17 May, 2023

In this regard, the attention of the Complainant is drawn towards a judgment of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the matter of Registrar of Companies & Ors. v. Dharmendra Kumar Garg & Anr. [W.P.(C) 11271/2009] dated 01.06.2012 wherein it was held:

Central Information Commission Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - S Punhani - Full Document

Arun vs Ut Of Puducherry on 22 July, 2025

48. Now, being Complaint under Section 18 of the RTI Act, the facts of the case do not warrant any action under Section 18(2) of the RTI Act against the CPIO as it does not bear any mala fides or an intention to deliberately obstruct the access to information as alleged by the Complainant. Here, it is relevant to quote a judgment of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the matter of Registrar of Companies & Ors v. Dharmendra Kumar Garg & Anr. [W.P.(C) 11271/2009] dated 01.06.2012 wherein it was held:

Central Information Commission Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Arun vs Ut Of Puducherry on 22 July, 2025

48. Now, being Complaint under Section 18 of the RTI Act, the facts of the case do not warrant any action under Section 18(2) of the RTI Act against the CPIO as it does not bear any mala fides or an intention to deliberately obstruct the access to information as alleged by the Complainant. Here, it is relevant to quote a judgment of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the matter of Registrar of Companies & Ors v. Dharmendra Kumar Garg & Anr. [W.P.(C) 11271/2009] dated 01.06.2012 wherein it was held:

Central Information Commission Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Arun vs Ut Of Puducherry on 22 July, 2025

48. Now, being Complaint under Section 18 of the RTI Act, the facts of the case do not warrant any action under Section 18(2) of the RTI Act against the CPIO as it does not bear any mala fides or an intention to deliberately obstruct the access to information as alleged by the Complainant. Here, it is relevant to quote a judgment of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the matter of Registrar of Companies & Ors v. Dharmendra Kumar Garg & Anr. [W.P.(C) 11271/2009] dated 01.06.2012 wherein it was held:

Central Information Commission Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next