citedby: 1130082

1 - 10 of 120 (1.28 seconds)

Documents citing Union Of India & Ors vs Rajpal Singh on 7 November, 2008

H K Munegowda vs M/O Finance on 4 March, 2020

would serve no purpose, particularly in view of the fact that the issue is pending consideration before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the findings in Rajpal (supra) stands stayed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

Central Administrative Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 33 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ashok Godhandas Israni vs Central Board Of Excise & Custom on 22 September, 2017

23 Accordingly we decline to entertain the OA since the same would serve no purpose, particularly in view of the fact that the issue is pending consideration before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the findings in Rajpal (supra) stands stayed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The OA stands rejected. There shall be no orders as to costs."

Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Atul Chaturvedi vs Central Board Of Excise & Custom on 25 January, 2021

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in M. V. Mohannan (supra) in categorical terms held that the decision rendered in Union of India vs. Rajpal case ought not to have been quoted as precedent having been dismissed on the ground that no sufficient cause was shown for the delay in re- filing. The Hon'ble Supreme Court observed thus, "49.

Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

R J Thakkar vs Central Excise & Customs on 25 January, 2021

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in M. V. Mohannan (supra) in categorical terms held that the decision rendered in Union of India vs. Rajpal case ought not to have been quoted as precedent having been dismissed on the ground that no sufficient cause was shown for the delay in re-filing. The Hon'ble Supreme Court observed thus, "49.

Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sebi Joseph Dias vs Central Excise & Customs on 25 January, 2021

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in M. V. Mohannan (supra) in categorical terms held that the decision rendered in Union of India vs. Rajpal case ought not to have been quoted as precedent having been dismissed on the ground that no sufficient cause was shown for the delay in re-filing. The Hon'ble Supreme Court observed thus, "49.

Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vijaykumar Nagjibhai Thakkar vs Central Excise & Customs on 25 January, 2021

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in M. V. Mohannan (supra) in categorical terms held that the decision rendered in Union of India vs. Rajpal case ought not to have been quoted as precedent having been dismissed on the ground that no sufficient cause was shown for the delay in re-filing. The Hon'ble Supreme Court observed thus, "49.

Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ashok Godhandas Israni vs Central Board Of Excise & Custom on 25 January, 2021

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in M. V. Mohannan (supra) in categorical terms held that the decision rendered in Union of India vs. Rajpal case ought not to have been quoted as precedent having been (CAT/AHMEDABAD BENCH/FRESH OA/246/2017) 33 dismissed on the ground that no sufficient cause was shown for the delay in re-filing. The Hon'ble Supreme Court observed thus, "49.

Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bajranglal Meena vs Central Board Of Excise & Custom on 25 January, 2021

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in M. V. Mohannan (supra) in categorical terms held that the decision rendered in Union of India vs. Rajpal case ought not to have been quoted as precedent having been dismissed on the ground that no sufficient cause was shown for the delay in re-filing. The Hon'ble Supreme Court observed thus, "49.

Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shreeram Meena vs Central Board Of Excise & Custom on 25 January, 2021

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in M. V. Mohannan (supra) in categorical terms held that the decision rendered in Union of India vs. Rajpal case ought not to have been quoted as precedent having been dismissed on the ground that no sufficient cause was shown for the delay in re-filing. The Hon'ble Supreme Court observed thus, "49.

Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shrichand Jirwal vs Central Board Of Excise & Custom on 25 January, 2021

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in M. V. Mohannan (supra) in categorical terms held that the decision rendered in Union of India vs. Rajpal case ought not to have been quoted as precedent having been (CAT/AHMEDABAD BENCH/OA/656/2016 ) 40 dismissed on the ground that no sufficient cause was shown for the delay in re-filing. The Hon'ble Supreme Court observed thus, "49.

Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next