Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.77 seconds)
Documents citing Mr Michael Graham Prince vs Mrs Nisha Misra on 24 February, 2022

Kiran Kumar Chava Alias Kiran Chava vs Usha Kiran Anne on 1 February, 2023

In the case of Mr.Michael Graham Prince vs. Mrs.Nisha Misra decided on 24 February, 2022, reported in [Manu/KA/06/11/2022], the Karnataka High Court observed the following: it was held that “persons Page 16 of 53 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.Nos.3586 & 4156 of 2022 holding Overseas citizen of India cards can seek matrimonial relief against persons holding similar OCI Cards, before the appropriate courts in India and rejected the petition of an estranged husband who had challenged the decision of a family court in Bangalore to entertain the matrimonial case instituted against him by his estranged wife”. Para 5 of the said judgment reads as under:
Madras High Court Cites 61 - Cited by 0 - S M Subramaniam - Full Document

Santoshi Pattern vs Vijay Kumar Gurramkonda on 23 October, 2025

8. The respondent filed his counter affidavit claiming that both parties are OCI card holders and said cards do not affect the jurisdiction of the trial Court and therefore, the trial Court has to entertain F.C.O.P. as both the parties got OCI cards in the year 2019 and both of them last lived together in territorial jurisdiction of the trial Court. The respondent contended that their marriage dispute has to be adjudicated as per the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, by the Courts in India and therefore, the trial Court has jurisdiction. Referring to the divorce proceedings in the Courts at USA, the respondent pleaded that after the F.C.O.P. was filed before the trial Court, the petitioner moved the Utah Court and there were no parallel proceedings when the F.C.O.P. was filed on 12.12.2022. The children were admitted into Sancta Maria International School, Hyderabad, and a car was also purchased. All the movable assets in USA were relocated through Universal Relocation Shipping Company to Hyderabad. Further, rejection of plaint has to be granted on the basis of averments of the F.C.O.P. without looking into contents of the written statement filed by the respondent to the O.P. i.e., petitioner herein. Therefore, prayed to dismiss 6 (1981) 4 SCC 517 7 (2023) SCC Online Del 5560 8 2017 SCC Online Del 10593 5 RY,J CRP_211_2024 the present revision petition by referring to the judgments in Liverpool & London S.P. & I Association Limited v. M.V. Sea Success I 9, Dahiben (cited supra), Madhavi Sirothia v. N.N. Sirothi 10, P.V. Gururaj Reddy v. P. Neeradha Reddy 11, Michael Graham Prince v. Nisha Misra 12 and Anushka Rengunthwar v. Union of India 13.
Telangana High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1