Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.42 seconds)
Documents citing Dev Karan vs Bhagwan Dass on 19 November, 1990

Jaspal Kaur vs Mander Singh on 15 November, 2000

This has to be done in presence of the person who had identified the house and in whose presence copy was affixed. The procedure adopted by Surjit Singh and Ran Singh process servers, was not beyond the provisions of law. Thus, no infirmity can be found in the judgment of the trial Court holding that the defendant-appellant has been duly served. Besides, that there is the ratio of rulings 1991 PLJ 173 : 1991(2) RRR 303 (P&H), Dev Koran v. Bhagwan Dass where it was observed that as ex parte decree cannot be set aside on the sole ground that there had been irregularity in the service of summons, especially when the application for setting aside the exparte ecree was filed beyond limitation.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - R L Anand - Full Document

Baldev Singh vs Jiwan Kumar Pathak on 20 September, 2004

7. For the sake of argument, even if it is presumed that no copy of the ejectment petition was received by the tenant-petitioner, it would at best be a mere irregularity within the meaning of proviso to Rule 8 of Order IX of the Code because on 8.8.1997 the tenant-petitioner was appraised that the date of appearance before the Court is 23.8.1997, as has been held by this Court in Dev Koran's case (supra). Therefore, no ground is provided to set aside the impugned order.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1