Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.39 seconds)
Documents citing Dilip Madhukar Patil vs The State Of Maharashtra Thru Chief ... on 27 June, 2019

Avinash @ Suraj Ashok Singh Through His ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 19 May, 2021

9. The Learned counsel for the Petitioner has also submitted that this Court has released convicts on Emergency Parole from Nashik Prison wherein similar objections were taken by the Prison Authorities. He has relied on the ratio laid down in Rajesh s/o Madhukar Patil vs. The State of Maharashtra in Aarti Palkar ::: Uploaded on - 22/05/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 12/09/2021 10:35:10 ::: 5/5 25.WP.1978.2021.doc Writ Petition No.1907 of 2021, wherein the Division Bench of this Court (Coram : Prasanna B. Varale & N.R. Borkar, JJ) has considered the capacity of Nashik Central Prison and considered the Notification issued by the State Government dated 08.05.2021 for releasing the prisoners to decongest the Jail. It appears that the Petitioner is similarly circumstanced.
Bombay High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Anil Jagannath Yadav vs The State Of Maharashtra on 19 May, 2021

9. The Learned counsel for the Petitioner has also submitted that this Court has released convicts on Emergency Parole from Nashik Prison wherein similar objections were taken by the Prison Authorities. He has relied on the ratio laid down in Rajesh s/o Madhukar Patil vs. The State of Maharashtra in Writ Petition No.1907 of 2021, wherein the Division Bench of this Court Aarti Palkar ::: Uploaded on - 22/05/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 12/09/2021 10:35:22 ::: 5/5 79.WP.1927.2021.doc (Coram : Prasanna B. Varale & N.R. Borkar, JJ) has considered the capacity of Nashik Central Prison and considered the Notification issued by the State Government dated 08.05.2020 for releasing the prisoners to decongest the Jail. It appears that the Petitioner is similarly circumstanced.
Bombay High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sharafat Ali Liyakat Ali Through His ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 19 May, 2021

9. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner has also submitted that this Court has released convicts on Emergency Parole from Nashik prison wherein similar objections were taken by the Prison Authority. He has relied on the ratio laid down in Rajesh s/o Madhukar Patil vs. The State of Maharashtra in Writ Petition No.1907 of 2021, wherein the Division Bench of this Court (Coram : Prasanna B. Varale & N.R. Borkar, JJ) has considered the capacity of Nashik Central Prison and considered the notification issued by the State Government dated 08.05.2020 for releasing the prisoner to decongest the jail. It appears that the Petitioner is similarly circumstanced.
Bombay High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S P Tavade - Full Document

Durgesh Narayan Thakur vs District Collector Jalgaon And Others on 11 December, 2019

2 33-WP.2910-19.odt same is erroneous and perverse observation. The said validities are issued after the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in case of Madhuri Patil Vs. State. The learned advocate further submits that the pre-constitutional entries have not been considered by the Committee in the whole judgment. The judgment is delivered by the committee under the premise of area restriction, the same is not relevant.
Bombay High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A G Gharote - Full Document

Rekha Sunil Sonwane vs Durgesh Narayan Thakur And Others on 11 December, 2019

2 33-WP.2910-19.odt same is erroneous and perverse observation. The said validities are issued after the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in case of Madhuri Patil Vs. State. The learned advocate further submits that the pre-constitutional entries have not been considered by the Committee in the whole judgment. The judgment is delivered by the committee under the premise of area restriction, the same is not relevant.
Bombay High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A G Gharote - Full Document
1