Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.27 seconds)

Mondira Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd. And ... vs Kanan Kumar Maity And Ors. And Sri Sri ... on 29 March, 2006

32. In the case before us, no such fact has been proved by the plaintiffs and it appears that all along the property was maintained by Ganapati Chakraborty and Harimati Dasi and after her death, by Bhupendra Nath Roy Chowdhury and Bithika Roy Chowdhury. Therefore, the principle laid down in the case of Sarat Chandra (supra) has no application to the fact of the present case.
Calcutta High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - B Bhattacharya - Full Document

Brij Nandan Mahasetha vs Thakur Ramchandra Jee Maharaj& on 7 July, 2011

21. The learned counsel for the appellant next relied upon AIR 1957 Calcutta 11 Sarat Chandra Bhattacharjee Vs. Rabindra Nath Ghosh and others. A Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court held that the fact that the image was originally the family idol of Dinbandhu or that the Seba Puja was carried on by him and his successor do not really militate against the conclusion of a public trust. This decision is in favour of respondent-plaintiff.
Patna High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - M Sahoo - Full Document
1