Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.34 seconds)
Documents citing Dena Bank vs Gautam Ratilal Shah And Others on 15 June, 1987

Bank Of Baroda vs Har Kishore Jain on 8 December, 1988

The fact remains that the law laid down by the Division Bench of this Court in Dena Bank v. Gautam Pawlal Shah (supra) as also the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Pirgonda Hongonda Patil's case (supra) results in the legal position that the law laid down in the two Judgments, mentioned above, Burjorji Jivanji Todiwalla v. Hormusji (supra) and Sitaram Krishna Padhye v. Chimandas Fatehchand (supra) is no longer a good law.
Bombay High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - S V Manohar - Full Document

Hdfc Bank Ltd vs Ashapura Minechem Ltd on 18 January, 2017

In view of judgment of Supreme Court referred to above, reliance placed on judgment of Bombay High Court is of little assistance for respondent. Even if it is assumed that proposed amendment if permitted would relate back to date of suit or original application, since the defence of limitation is neither raised nor is likely to ::: Uploaded on - 19/01/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 20/01/2017 01:01:17 ::: 7 WP.2822-2015 be defeated in original application, aforesaid objection for consideration of application for amendment of pleadings is of little consequence and does not deserve consideration. It is also permissible for Courts to declare, while permitting amendment of pleadings, that such amendment shall not relate back to date of suit.
Bombay High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 1 - R M Borde - Full Document
1