Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 404 (5.69 seconds)
Documents citing Guruvayur Devaswom Managing Commit. & ... vs C.K. Rajan & Others on 14 August, 2003

Committee Of Management, Anjuman ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary, ... on 5 April, 2007

Furthermore it is well settled that even in a case where a petitioner might have moved the Court in his private interest and for redressal of personal grievances, the Court In furtherance of the public Interest may treat it necessary to enquire Into the state of affairs of the subject of litigation In the interest of justice (see Guruyayoo Devasworn Managing Committe v. C.K. Rajan SCC para 50 and Prahlad Singh v. Col. Sukhdev Singh .
Allahabad High Court Cites 49 - Cited by 1 - S N Srivastava - Full Document

Shyamal Ranjan Mukerjee Son Of Late ... vs Nirmal Ranjan Mukerjee Son Of Late ... on 30 August, 2007

Furthermore it is well settled that even in a case where a petitioner might have moved the Court in his private interest and for redressal of personal grievances, the Court in furtherance of the public interest may treat it necessary to enquire into the state of affairs of the subject of litigation in the interest of justice see Guruvavoo Devaswom Managing Committee v. C.K. Rajan SCC para 50 and Prahlad Singh v. Col. Sukhdev Sinoh .
Allahabad High Court Cites 45 - Cited by 1 - S N Srivastava - Full Document

Kiran Yadav vs Commissioner, Lucknow & 2 Ors. on 16 May, 2013

"Furthermore it is well settled that even in a case where a petitioner might have moved the Court in his private interest and for redressal of personal grievances, the Court in furtherance of the public interest may treat it necessary to enquire into the state of affairs of the subject of litigation in the interest of justice (see Guruyayoo Devaswom Managing Committee v. C.K. Rajan, SCC para 50 and Prahlad Singh versus Col. Sukhdev Singh (1987) 1 SCC 727)."
Allahabad High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - D P Singh - Full Document

Sameer Kumar vs State Of U.P.Thr.Prin.Secy.Medical ... on 12 September, 2014

"Furthermore it is well settled that even in a case where a petitioner might have moved the Court in his private interest and for redressal of personal grievances, the Court in furtherance of the public interest may treat it necessary to enquire into the state of affairs of the subject of litigation in the interest of justice (see Guruyayoo Devaswom Managing Committee v. C.K. Rajan, SCC para 50 and Prahlad Singh versus Col. Sukhdev Singh (1987) 1 SCC 727)."
Allahabad High Court Cites 62 - Cited by 2 - D P Singh - Full Document

Aharwas Singh @ Atarwas Singh (At :- ... vs Lucknow Development Authority Lucknow ... on 12 September, 2014

"Furthermore it is well settled that even in a case where a petitioner might have moved the Court in his private interest and for redressal of personal grievances, the Court in furtherance of the public interest may treat it necessary to enquire into the state of affairs of the subject of litigation in the interest of justice (see Guruyayoo Devaswom Managing Committee v. C.K. Rajan, SCC para 50 and Prahlad Singh versus Col. Sukhdev Singh (1987) 1 SCC 727)."
Allahabad High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 1 - D P Singh - Full Document

Bombay Environmental Action Group, A ... vs The State Of Maharashtra Through The ... on 17 October, 2005

G.P. Mathur J. was a party to the said decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, as also a party to the earlier decision in Guruvayuoor Devaswom Managing Committee v. C.K. Rajan (supra). Nevertheless, the Hon'ble Supreme Court did not dismiss the said Civil Appeal on the ground that the same arose out of a writ petition, filed in the High Court in public interest, which challenged the constitutional validity of a statute.
Bombay High Court Cites 139 - Cited by 17 - S Radhakrishnan - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next