Union Of India vs M/S Rama Contractor on 16 February, 2015
5. The petitioner during the course of execution of the work and even
after completion did not dispute the rates analysis in respect of items
No.1(a) and 2(a). The items were accordingly executed to the
satisfaction of petitioner. The quantum of work executed was
measured by the petitioner. It is stated that there is no disputed with
regard to the quantum of work executed and payable by the petitioner
to the claimant/respondent. However, the petitioner long after
completion of the work made the payment at the reduced rates. It is
stated that as the petitioner required the 'claimant to execute the
further extra items, the claimant/respondent accordingly submitted
the rate analysis in respect of various items with the letter dated
15.05.2007. The respondent long after completion of the work reduced
the rates from the payable rates as shown in the claim statement. The
petitioner during the course of execution of the work and even after
4/12 Union of India vs. Rama Contractor
completion did not dispute the rates analysis in respect of these items.