Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.46 seconds)
Documents citing Bhola @ Mata Charan vs State Of U.P. & Others on 3 August, 2010

Makhan Singh Mukh Sewadar,, Amritsar. vs Assessee on 8 January, 2014

Matant Inderash Charan Dass vs. State of UP 81 ITR 435 27 ITA No.440(Asr)/2012 In this case, the management of the endowment had devolved upon the Mahant in the tradition from Guru to Chela and no accession to the Gaddi the Mahant severed his relations and connections with the family. The Mahant was elected by Sikh Chiefs in Panchayat from among the Chelas of the last Guru. The property belonged to the institution and the Mahant was merely its administrator.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Amritsar Cites 50 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Malti Srivastava vs State Of U.P. & Others on 7 December, 2018

20. Now coming to the authorities relied upon by the learned counsel for the respondents, I find that the judgment in the case of Mata Baran v. State of U.P. and others reported in 2012 (2) ADJ 189, cannot be applied to the facts of the present case. It is not a case of the petitioner that there was particular qualification required and that the 6th respondent did not possess that particular qualification. All that is argued is that the petitioner was appointed as Assistant Teacher in the Institution as Music Teacher though there was no sanctioned strength to that effect in the recognized institution at that stage. It is not a case of the petitioner that selection, approval and appointment of the 6th respondent at the time of the institution being brought on grant-in-aid, in any manner, was illegal.
Allahabad High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 1 - A Kumar - Full Document

Maqsood Alam vs State Of U.P. And Others on 18 August, 2022

4. Per contra, Sri Jitendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing for respondents, submits that it was admitted case of petitioner that he was less than 18 years of age on the date of his appointment, therefore, it would be contrary to Rule 8 of Rules, 1955. He placed reliance on this Court's judgment in Mata Baran vs. State of U.P. and others, 2012(2) ADJ 189 that any appointment made in contravention of rules would be void ab initio and long continuance of service would not confer any right upon the incumbent to hold post.
Allahabad High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - S S Shamshery - Full Document
1