Kalidas vs K.P. Subbian on 25 July, 2013
In M.Vedapuri Vs. O.M. Raj and Another (2008 (5) CTC 404) the learned Judge of this Court at paragraph 14 has held as follows:-
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.42 seconds)Documents citing
M.Vedapuri vs O.M.Raj on 14 October, 2008
Rabiya Basheer Ali vs C.Devandra Prased on 19 May, 2010
In M.Vedapuri vs. O.M.Raj and another, reported in CDJ 2008 MHC 4400, this Court (S.TAMILVANAN, J), based on the Advocate-Commissioner's report and plan marked as Exs.C.1 and C.2 held that the petition premises therein was not properly maintained due to the waste and left out of the chicken meat stall found at the premises and was emanating bad and foul smell in an unhygienic condition.
Jean Mare Daniel Bisch vs Larcher Antonie Marie Jules Desire on 15 March, 2011
In M.Vedapuri vs. O.M.Raj, reported in 2008 (5) CTC 404, this Court (S.TAMILVANAN, J), has held that eviction of tenant sought for on the grounds of wilful default, own use and occupation of the landlord and acts of waste and ordered on establishing the bonafide on the side of the landlord. It was further held that when there is concurrent finding by the Courts below, unless there is any illegality or material irregularity, based on perverse finding, this Court, while exercising Revisional Jurisdiction cannot interfere with the same. It is well settled that the finding could be perverse only, if it is against evidence available on record or when the same is not supported by evidence.
Dr. M.V.Shantha vs Mr. Ratan Lal Dalmia on 21 April, 2016
(v) 2008-5-CTC 404 (M.Vedapuri v. O.M.Raj and another):-
X.John Kennedy vs C.Sornasekar Devadoss on 2 February, 2024
11. The learned Rent Control Appellate Authority has rightly relied
on the judgment of this Court in M.Vedapuri Vs. O.M.Raj and another
reported in 2008 (5) CTC 404, wherein, this Court has specifically
observed that merely because the landlords are having some other
buildings, their bona fide requirement cannot be disputed on that ground
and that the Court has to consider whether the reason, as stated by the
landlord is bona fide or not.
1