Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.26 seconds)
Documents citing The Chief Executive Officer, Tamilnadu ... vs P. Venkataraman And The State Of Tamil ... on 17 September, 2007

Sri Madhavaperumal Temple vs Dhanalakshmi on 3 June, 2019

29.The counsel for the plaintiffs in respect of his contentions has placed reliance upon the decisions reported in 2010 (1) CWC 124 (Arulmighu Thiruvateeswarar Devasthanam, Triplicane, Madras – 5, rep. by its Executive Offiver Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, rep.by its Secretary, Land Administration Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 9 and 4 others), AIR 1981 MADRAS 318 (G.N.Venkataswamy Vs. Tamil Nadu Small Industries Development Corporation Ltd., and others) and the judgment of this Court dated 11.07.1996 passed in S.A.No.1397 of 1986 (Sri Madhavaperumal Devasthanam, Mylapore, Madras – 4 reptd., by Executive Officer Vs. Dhanalakshmi and six others).
Madras High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - T Ravindran - Full Document

Muthulnagammal vs The Superintendent Engineer on 1 December, 2009

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had made representations on 25.5.1998, 24.1.2002 and 10.1.2003. However the impugned order does not disclose the representation dated 24.1.2002, even though there is an acknowledgement by the respondent. Apart from that, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was a rule in the proceedings issued by the Electricity Board dated 14.6.1997, which enables the Electricity Board to make appointment of the family members of the employees who died in harness within three years from the date of their attaining majority, if they are minor. Learned counsel also relied upon a judgement of a Division Bench of this court in Tmt.T.Rajamani versus The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, 800 Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002 and two others reported in 2007 WLR 309 and in Chief Engineer/Personal, Tamilnadu Electricity Board and others vs. P.Venkatesan reported in CDJ LJ dated 2.7.2009 to support his claim that even after three years, the application for appointment on compassionate ground can be considered.
Madras High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - N Kirubakaran - Full Document
1