Ramesh vs State Of U.P. on 22 January, 2021
Bail Application No. 45310 of 2017 (Bhagirath Vs. State of U.P.) respectively. The copies of the said orders have been produced before the Court which are taken on record.
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.42 seconds)Documents citing
Bhagirath Arya & Others vs State Of U.P.& Others on 9 January, 2012
Bhagirath And 2 Others vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 23 November, 2020
3. It is stated by counsel for petitioners that without execution of sale deed, the respondents are trying to dispossess the petitioners for which they had earlier approached this Court by way of a writ petition bearing Writ-C No. 39822 of 2019 (Bhagirath and others vs. State of U.P. and others) decided vide order dated 06.12.2019. At that time, land of petitioners was not acquired or possessed so as to execute a sale deed and, therefore, writ petition was disposed of with a clarity that in future, if respondents interfere in possession of land, the same would save by the process of law. It is stated that petitioners are going to be dispossessed forcefully thus respondents be directed to first execute the sale deed.
Bhagirath vs State Of U.P. And Another on 17 June, 2021
This appeal has been preferred under Section 14 (A) (2) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, against the impugned order dated 13.1.2021 passed by learned Special Judge (SC/ST Act) Rampur, in Bail Application No. 04 of 2021 (Bhagirath Vs. State of U.P.), arising out of Case Crime No. 258 of 2020, under Section 302/34 IPC and Section 3(2)(V) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Police Station Milakh, District Rampur, whereby the bail application of the appellant has been rejected vide impugned order dated 13.1.2021.
1