Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.96 seconds)

Shreee Narsinha Nagari Sahakari ... vs I.T.O Ward-10(1), Pune, Pune on 26 June, 2025

17. The expression "sufficient cause" for condonation of delay in section 5 of Limitation Act should receive a liberal construction so as to advance the substantial justice when no negligence or inaction or want of bona fide is imputable to party. [refer- State of West Bengal v. Administrator, Howrah Municipality AIR 1972 SC 749 (SC); Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd. v. Addl. CIT/Jt. CIT [2006] 6 SOT 497 (Mum.)]
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Pune Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shree Narsinha Nagari Sahakari ... vs I.T.O, Ward-10(1), Pune, Pune on 26 June, 2025

17. The expression "sufficient cause" for condonation of delay in section 5 of Limitation Act should receive a liberal construction so as to advance the substantial justice when no negligence or inaction or want of bona fide is imputable to party. [refer- State of West Bengal v. Administrator, Howrah Municipality AIR 1972 SC 749 (SC); Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd. v. Addl. CIT/Jt. CIT [2006] 6 SOT 497 (Mum.)]
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Pune Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shree Narsinha Nagari Sahakari ... vs Ito Ward 10(1), Pune, Pune on 26 June, 2025

17. The expression "sufficient cause" for condonation of delay in section 5 of Limitation Act should receive a liberal construction so as to advance the substantial justice when no negligence or inaction or want of bona fide is imputable to party. [refer- State of West Bengal v. Administrator, Howrah Municipality AIR 1972 SC 749 (SC); Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd. v. Addl. CIT/Jt. CIT [2006] 6 SOT 497 (Mum.)]
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Pune Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shree Narsinha Nagari Sahakari ... vs Ito Ward 10(1), Pune, Pune on 26 June, 2025

17. The expression "sufficient cause" for condonation of delay in section 5 of Limitation Act should receive a liberal construction so as to advance the substantial justice when no negligence or inaction or want of bona fide is imputable to party. [refer- State of West Bengal v. Administrator, Howrah Municipality AIR 1972 SC 749 (SC); Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd. v. Addl. CIT/Jt. CIT [2006] 6 SOT 497 (Mum.)]
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Pune Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shree Narsinha Nagari Sahakari ... vs Ito, Ward10(1), Pune, Pune on 26 June, 2025

17. The expression "sufficient cause" for condonation of delay in section 5 of Limitation Act should receive a liberal construction so as to advance the substantial justice when no negligence or inaction or want of bona fide is imputable to party. [refer- State of West Bengal v. Administrator, Howrah Municipality AIR 1972 SC 749 (SC); Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd. v. Addl. CIT/Jt. CIT [2006] 6 SOT 497 (Mum.)]
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Pune Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next