Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.34 seconds)
Documents citing Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd vs Prakash Chand And Ors on 18 October, 2011

M/S Imperial Motors vs Parkash Chand on 16 August, 2013

Application No.1913 of 2012 in/& F.A. No.1233 of 2012 (M/s Mahindra & Mahindra Limited Vs Parkash Chand & Ors.) as both the appeals have been filed against the same impugned order dated 23.04.2012 passed by the learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Ferozepur (in short "the District Forum"). The facts are taken from Misc. Application No.2378 of 2012 in/& F.A. No.1546 of 2012 and the parties would be referred by their status in this application/appeal.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. vs Prakash Chand on 18 September, 2015

In view of our above discussions, as recorded above, by setting aside the order of District Forum Ferozepur dated 23.04.2012, we accept the first appeal no.1233 of 2012 titled as "Mahindra & Mahindra Limited Vs. Parkash Chand and others" and we also accept the first appeal no.1546 of 2012 titles as "Imperial Motors Vs. Parkash Chand & others" by directing that this case stands transferred to District Forum Bathinda, which has the requisite jurisdiction to try the complaint. The District Forum Bathinda shall procure the presence of the parties before it and then decide the case denovo in accordance with law. The registry is directed to send the case file to District Forum Bathinda within 30 days period.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Sachdeva & Sons Rice Mills Ltd vs Kotam Mahindra Bank Ltd And Others on 8 April, 2013

In respect of such argument, learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon an order passed by a Division Bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court in a case " Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. and others vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others" M.CR.C.No. 7310 of 2011 decided on 23rd January 2012 arising out of a petition seeking quashing of proceedings initiated by the Chief Judicial Magistrate under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. The reference of learned counsel for the petitioner is on para No. 26 of the aforesaid judgment which reads as under:-
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1