Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.37 seconds)
Documents citing Shri Rajeev Chadha vs Ms. Shama Chadha Nee Shama Kapoor on 21 March, 2012

Kuljit Singh vs Meena Kumari Saini on 15 February, 2022

In support of his above submissions, learned counsel relies on judgments passed in Mamta Goyal Vs. Ramgopal, 2011(6) RCR (Civil) 783; Shri Rajeev Chadha Vs. Ms. Shama Chadha Nee Shama Kapoor, 2014(4) RCR (Civil) 587; Praveen Mehta Vs. Inderjit Mehta, Law Finder DC ID #2774; K. Srinivas Vs. K. Sunita, 2014(16) SCC 34 and Sivasankaran Vs. Santhimeenal, 2021(4) RCR (Civil) 237. Learned counsel thus submits that the Family Court has erred in dismissing the petition of the appellant for grant of divorce under Section 13 of the Act.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - R Bahri - Full Document

Shankar Mallick vs Sarita Kumari on 12 February, 2024

31. The appellant had further asserted that she always had reluctance to maintain the conjugal relationship with him and every time she would make some demand for gift or jewellery to establish the sexual relationship. The respondent has vehemently denied these allegations but has explained that the appellant himself used to come drunk in the night and harass and beat her. Again, some truth can be inferred from the explanation given by the respondent. There is no complete denial of the claim of the appellant of there being no healthy sexual relationship which itself is an anathema to any happy married life as has been held in the case of Rajeev Chadha Vs. Shama Chadha Nee Shama Kapoor, (2012) 188 DLT 313.
Delhi High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - N B Krishna - Full Document
1