Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (2.18 seconds)

Nafiz Alam Nurul Hudda Shaikh And Ors vs The State Of Maharashtra on 27 April, 2018

Reliance is placed on State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Ghudan2, Sarwan Singh vs. State of Punjab3 as well as State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Jageshwar and Others4. It is further contended on behalf of the appellant/ accused no.3 that mandate of Section 100(6) of the Code of 1 (2014) 3 Supreme Court Cases 412 2 (2003) 12 Supreme Court Cases 485 3 AIR 1957 SC 637 4 (1983) 2 Supreme Court Cases 305 avk 10 ::: Uploaded on - 27/04/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 28/04/2018 01:44:24 ::: APPEAL-354-2013-J.doc Criminal Procedure is not followed by the prosecution and Nazrul and Aminul, who were occupants of the said room, were not given the list of items seized and their signatures were not taken on the Recovery Panchnama.
Bombay High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - A M Badar - Full Document

Anil @ Bahuwa @ Hakla vs State on 16 March, 2023

21. Further, as regards the recovery of the weapon of offence i.e. the pistol, the case of the prosecution has been that the said weapon was recovered from one Sher Khan from whom the appellant had allegedly borrowed the pistol and after using the same, returned it back. It would be CRL.A. 1107/2018 Signature Not Verified Page 14 of 17 Digitally Signed By:ANIL KUMAR BHATT Signing Date:16.03.2023 14:51:16 N.C.2023:DHC:1879-DB pertinent to refer to the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in (1983) 2 SCC 305 State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Jageshwar & Ors., wherein it was held:
Delhi High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - M Gupta - Full Document
1