Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.26 seconds)
Documents citing Smt. Premwati vs Union Of India And Ors on 6 September, 2023

Smt Shakuntla vs Union Of India And Anr on 28 May, 2024

5. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order as also the order passed by the learned Tribunal in Smt. Premwati (supra) alongwith the order passed by the Court in Smt. Premwati (supra), we are of the view that the petitioner deserves to be granted interest on the ex-gratia compensation amount which was admittedly paid to her after more than almost 19 years from the date of her husband's death. As noted hereinabove, though the petitioner's husband expired on 03.09.1998, she has been released the ex-gratia compensation amount only on 13.04.2017 and that too after filing of the O.A. by her before the learned Tribunal.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - R Palli - Full Document

Manmood Shankar vs Life Insurance Corporation Of India on 7 January, 2026

A Division Bench of this Court, in Smt. Premwati v. Union of India,3 while dealing with family pension, has held that denial of back wages on the "no work, no pay" principle does not, by itself, defeat deemed continuity flowing from reinstatement, and does not disentitle the employee from having the relevant period counted for the limited purpose of qualifying service.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - S Narula - Full Document

Urmal Bala vs Garrison Engineer on 16 April, 2024

3. The applicant relied on order dated 17.04.2018 by Principal Bench of this Tribunal at New Delhi in the case of Smt. Bimla Devi Vs Union of India & Ors (O.A No.1103/2016) wherein six months' period was held to be sufficient to release the amount of Ex-Gratia, and other orders in O.A 3 No.3785/2017 (Smt. Premwati Vs Union of India & Ors.) dated 29.11.2018 and O.A No.3371/2017 (Manorma Devi Vs Union of India) dated 04.04.2019.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1