Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.37 seconds)

Ganesh Mahto vs The Chairman, Uttar Bihar Gramin Bank ... on 12 September, 2025

In this regard, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on the judgment of this Hon'ble Court rendered in the case of Rabindra Nath vs. the Chairman, Uttar Bihar Gramin Bank and Ors. reported in 2017 (2) PLJR 634. This judgment of learned single judge has been Patna High Court CWJC No.3043 of 2017 dt...12-09-2025 8/20 affirmed by this Hon'ble Court in LPA No. 761 of 2017 vide order dated 08.08.2017. Subsequently the bank filed an appeal before the Hon'ble Supreme Court wherein vide order dated 22.11.2018 passed in Civil Appeal No. 11270 of 2018 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 23062 of 2017), order of this Hon'ble Court has been affirmed. Hence, the present writ petition be allowed by quashing the impugned orders.
Patna High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Anshuman - Full Document

Vinay Kumar Rai vs The Central Bank Of India And Ors on 13 March, 2023

Thereafter, he filed CWJC No. 7345 of 2009. During pendency of the writ-petition, learned Single Judge had recorded that writ-petition could be heard only on the quantum of punishment, such recording or ordering was not questioned by the appellant in filing LPA, therefore, he was compelled to restrict his argument before the Patna High Court L.P.A No.1143 of 2017 dt.13-03-2023 4/6 learned Single Judge only to the extent of quantum of punishment. On the other hand, appellant submitted before the learned Single Judge that he was not guilty of the charges and the alleged charge does not amount to misconduct and it was further argued that penalty of compulsory retirement was harsh and disproportionate to proved charges. Learned Single Judge has taken note of the contentions and he had relied on Apex Court decision 2017 (2) PLJR 634 (Ravindra Nath Vs. Chairman, Uttar Bihar Gramin Bank), (2015)2 SCC 610 (Union of India and Ors. Vs. P. Gunasekaran), (2003) 4 SCC 364 (Chairman and Managing Director, United Commercial Bank and Ors. Vs. P.C. Kakkar). He has also taken note of disciplinary authority's order and reasons assigned therein.
1