Boppuri Sekhar vs The State Of A.P., Rep. Through P.P. on 6 October, 2018
29. Having regard to the above, once the prosecution evidence
unerringly shows it is the accused alone and none else that killed the
deceased while she was in his company, being the husband, there is
nothing to interfere with the finding of the trial Court of the accused is
guilty on the sole charge of he killed the deceased. As in similar facts
rightly concluded by a Division Bench of Karnataka High Court
referring to several expressions of the Apex Court including Eradu
and others v. State of Hyderabad12 and Ramesh v. State of
Karanataka13 of where the deceased and accused last seen and
accused failed to explain and on their converse raised a false defence
as if some other persons might have murdered the deceased when the
circumstances brought on record lead to only conclusion that accused
alone committed the murder of the deceased and attempted to cause
disappearance of evidence by setting fire to body of deceased
confirmed the conviction.