Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.88 seconds)
Documents citing Royal Sundram Alliance Insurance Co. ... vs Vimla Devi & Ors. on 28 May, 2014

Smt. Radha Nigam vs Sh. Manas Bansal on 9 September, 2014

"11.Since the court in Santosh Devi's case, 2012 ACJ 1428(SC), actually intended to follow the principle in the case of salaried persons as laid down in Sarla Verma's case, 2009 ACJ 1298(SC) and to make it applicable also to self­employed and persons on fixed wages, it is clarified that the increase in the case of those groups is not 30 percent always; it will also have a reference to the age.
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co ... vs Paramjeet Kaur & Ors on 23 September, 2014

6. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that PW-2 the employer in his testimony had exhibited his profit and loss accounts for the Assessment Year 2009-10 where he had shown total salary and wages payable at Rs.1,48,600/-. He relies on certain terms and conditions that no driver shall perform duty for more than eight hours daily and that there shall be two drivers for buses that ply for more than eight hours. Based on this, he submits that the evidence of PW-2 shows that in view of the fact that the total salary and wages paid for the Financial Year was Rs.1,48,600/- the MAC.APP.No.1102/2011 Page 2 of 7 salary of the deceased could not be more than Rs.4119/- per month as the employer would have to engage at least two drivers. He secondly submits that the future prospects of 50% had been erroneously given contrary to the judgment of this Court in the case of Royal Sundram Alliance Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Vimla Devi and others in MAC App.No.1192/2012 dated 28.05.2014.
Delhi High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - J Nath - Full Document
1