Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.36 seconds)

South Indian Artistes' Association vs The Registrar Of Societies on 19 June, 2019

80. The plea of discrimination, therefore, is without any tenable basis. The circumstances in which the enquiry may be held under Section 36(1) are not spelt out in Section 36(1), while situations in which the supersession can be effected are laid down in Section 34-A. The power to order an enquiry under Section 36(1) is a very wide power. The enquiry may be held by the Registrar on his own motion or on the application of a majority of the members of a committee of a society, or on the application of not less than 1/3 members of the society or at the request of the District Collector. Such enquiry can be with regard to the constitution, working and financial condition of the society. This wide power given to the Registrar to direct an enquiry under Section 36(1) into the affairs of the society from it's constitution upto its working and financial condition, is a power which the Registrar is required to exercise with a view to ensure that the 46/ 62 http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.Nos.17583, 31752 & 31755 of 2019 & connected matters society functions in accordance with law. The power given to the Government under Section 34-A to supersede the committee is a power which is meant to be used in sufficiently grave situations in the best interest of the society itself, with a view to safeguard the interest of the society and of it's membeRs. It enables the Government to act promptly in cases where immediate intervention is called for, having regard to all the facts and circumstances of the case and the gravity of the situation. Section 34-A does not offend Art. 14."

Babu Daniel vs The Madras Medical Mission on 1 October, 2021

63. On behalf of the applicant/plaintiff, one other decision of a Division Bench of this Court, was also cited, reported in 2016 SCC Online Madras 9701 (supra), wherein, in paragraphs 15 and 16 extracted supra, the Division Bench has held that when a party failed to obtain orders before the High Court and moving Civil Court for the same relief, the proceedings initiated by a party be struck-off on the ground that the party approached the Court with unclean hands. In the case on hand also, the affected parties having failed to obtain any relief from this Court, despite contest, the impugned notice dated 29.03.2021 by the third respondent/third defendant Page No.60/70 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ O.A.No.251 of 2021 in C.S.No.159 of 2021 is to be held as tainted with mala-fides.
Madras High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 0 - V Parthiban - Full Document
1