Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 148 (2.35 seconds)
Documents citing Onteru Bhaskar vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 19 January, 2022

M/S. Sri Sai Sahasra Traders vs State Of Andhra Pradesh on 7 May, 2026

6. However, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the judgement relied by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies and in the light of the latest order passed by a Division Bench of this Court in Onteru Bhaskar vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary, Civil Supplies Department and others1, in the considered opinion of this Court, it is appropriate and reasonable to direct the 2nd respondent to release the seized stock in favour of the 1st petitioner on imposing certain conditions and dispose of the writ petition by passing the following order:
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M Ramakrishna Reddy vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 11 July, 2022

6) Having heard the respective counsel and upon perusal of the material available on record, it is an admitted fact that subsequent to the seizure of the rice and vehicle, a proceedings under Section 6A are initiated before the 2nd Respondent, who is the competent authority. The illegality and validity of the seizure has to be decided by the 2nd Respondent in 6A proceedings. This Court is not inclined to interfere into the 6A proceedings. However, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in the light of the latest order passed by a Division Bench of this Court in Onteru Bhaskar vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary, Civil Supplies Department and others1 in our considered opinion, it is appropriate and reasonable to direct the 2nd Respondent to release the seized stock in favour of the petitioner on imposing certain condition, to protect the interest of the Respondents, pending disposal of the 6A proceedings by modifying the endorsement of the 2nd Respondent in Rc.No.B/34/2022, dated 14.05.2022.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - B Devanand - Full Document

S. Pandian And Sons, vs The State Of A.P. on 11 July, 2022

05. Having heard the respective counsel and upon perusal of the material available on record, it is an admitted fact that subsequent to the seizure of the rice and vehicle, a Proceedings under Section 6-A of the Essential Commodities Act, are initiated before the 2nd respondent, who is the competent authority. The illegality and validity of the seizure has to be decided by the 2nd respondent in 6-A Proceedings. However, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in the light of the latest order passed by a Division Bench of this Court in Onteru Bhaskar v State of A.P., represented by its Principal Secretary, Civil Supplies Department and others1 in our considered opinion, it is appropraite and reasonable to direct the 2nd respondent to release the seized stock and vehicle in favour of the petitioners on imposing certain conditions, to protect the interest of the Respondents, pending disposal of the 6-A Proceedings by modifying the Order of the 2nd Respondent in R.C.No.CS1/6A/82/2022, dated 18.06.2022.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - B Devanand - Full Document

Narla Aruna Kumari vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 26 July, 2022

9) Having heard the respective counsel, upon perusal of the material available on record, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in the light of the latest order passed by a Division Bench of this Court in Onteru Bhaskar vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal 4 Secretary, Civil Supplies Department and others1 in our considered opinion, it is appropriate and reasonable to direct the Respondents to release the seized stock in favour of the petitioner on imposing certain conditions.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - B Devanand - Full Document

Pilli Obul Reddy vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 28 July, 2022

04. Having heard the respective counsel and upon perusal of the material available on record, it is an admitted fact that subsequent to the seizure of the rice, a Proceedings under Section 6-A of the Essential Commodities Act, are initiated before the 2nd respondent, who is the competent authority. The illegality and validity of the seizure has to be decided by the 2nd respondent in 6-A Proceedings. However, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in the light of the latest order passed by a Division Bench of this Court in Onteru Bhaskar v State of A.P., represented by its Principal Secretary, Civil Supplies Department and others1 in our considered opinion, it is appropriate and reasonable to direct the respondent No.2 to release the seized stock in favour of the petitioner on imposing certain conditions, to protect the interest of the Respondents, pending disposal of the 6-A Proceedings by modifying the Order of the 2nd Respondent in Rc.CS1/6A/255/2021, dated 09.03.2022, dated 09.03.2022.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - B Devanand - Full Document

Veeresh Naik, vs The State Of A.P. on 4 August, 2022

8) Having heard the respective counsel, upon perusal of the material available on record, it is an admitted fact that subsequent to the seizure of the rice and vehicle, a proceedings under Section 6-A of the Essential Commodities Act, are initiated before the 2nd Respondent, who is the competent authority. The illegality and validity of the seizure has to be decided by the 2nd respondent in 6-A proceedings. However, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in the light of the latest order passed by a Division Bench 4 of this Court in Onteru Bhaskar vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary, Civil Supplies Department and others1 in our considered opinion, it is appropriate and reasonable to direct the Respondents to release the seized stock and vehicle in favour of the petitioners on imposing certain conditions.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - B Devanand - Full Document

O R D E R vs State Of Andhra Pradesh on 2 August, 2022

7) Having heard the respective counsel and upon perusal of the material available on record, it is an admitted fact that subsequent to the seizure of the rice and vehicle, a proceedings under Section 6-A are initiated before the 2nd Respondent, who is the competent authority. The illegality and validity of the seizure has to be decided by the 2nd Respondent in 6-A proceedings. This Court is not inclined to interfere into the 6-A proceedings. However, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in the light of the latest order passed by a Division Bench of this Court in Onteru Bhaskar vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary, Civil Supplies Department and others1 in our considered opinion, it is appropriate and reasonable to direct the 2nd Respondent to release the seized stock in favour of the 1 2022 SCC OnLine AP 348 4 petitioner on imposing certain condition, to protect the interest of the Respondents, pending disposal of the 6-A proceedings by setting aside the proceedings of the 2nd Respondent in Rc.No.B.36/2022, dated 14.06.2022.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - B Devanand - Full Document

WP/23799/2022 on 2 August, 2022

04. Having heard the respective counsel and upon perusal of the material available on record, it is an admitted fact that subsequent to the seizure of the stock, a Proceedings under Section 6-A of the Essential Commodities Act, are initiated before the 2nd respondent, who is the competent authority. The illegality and validity of the seizure has to be decided by the 2nd respondent in 6-A Proceedings. However, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in the light of the latest order passed by a Division Bench of this Court in Onteru Bhaskar v State of A.P., represented by its Principal Secretary, Civil Supplies Department and others 1 in our considered opinion, it is appropriate and reasonable to direct the respondent No.2 to release the seized stock in favour of the petitioner on imposing certain conditions, to protect the interest of the Respondents, pending disposal of the 6-A 1 2022 SCC Online Ap 348 3 Proceedings by modifying the Order of the 2nd Respondent in Rc.B.33/2022, dated 14.06.2022.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - B Devanand - Full Document

Malepati Venkata Suneel Kumar, vs The State Of A.P. on 12 August, 2022

4) However, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in the light of the latest order passed by a Division Bench of this Court in Onteru Bhaskar vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary, 2 Civil Supplies Department and others 1 in our considered opinion, it is appropriate and reasonable to direct the 2nd Respondent to release the seized stock in favour of the petitioner on imposing certain condition, to protect the interest of the Respondents, pending disposal of the 6A proceedings.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - B Devanand - Full Document

Nakka Venkateswarlu, vs The State Of A.P. on 10 August, 2022

6) Having heard the respective counsel and upon perusal of the material available on record, it is an admitted fact that subsequent to the seizure of the rice and vehicle, a proceedings under Section 6A are initiated before the 2nd Respondent, who is the competent authority. The illegality and validity of the seizure has to be decided by the 2nd Respondent in 6A proceedings. This Court is not inclined to interfere into the 6A proceedings. However, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in the light of the latest order passed by a Division Bench of this Court in Onteru Bhaskar vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary, Civil Supplies Department and others1 in our considered opinion, it is appropriate and reasonable to direct the 2nd Respondent to release the seized vehicle in favour of the petitioner on imposing certain condition, to protect the interest of the Respondents, pending disposal of the 6A proceedings by modifying the endorsement of the 2nd Respondent in Rc.No.CS1/6A/58/2022, dated 27.07.2022.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - B Devanand - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next