Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 564 (0.70 seconds)
Documents citing Kurvan Ansari Alias Kurvan Ali vs Shyam Kishore Murmu on 16 November, 2021

Sri Shiva Chand Prasad Agarwal @ Shiva ... vs The New India Assurance Company Limited ... on 3 November, 2022

In view of the settled principle of law in the case of Kurvan Ansari @ Kurvan Ali and Anr. vs. Shyam Kishore Murmu and Anr. (supra), this court has no hesitation in holding that the appropriate notional income should be Rs.25,000/- per annum and in view of principle of law settled in the case of Kurvan Ansari @ Kurvan Ali and Anr. vs. Shyam Kishore Murmu and Anr. (supra) and also in the case of National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi and Others (supra), the multiplier should be 15 and further the claimant is entitled to filial consortium of Rs. 80,000/- and funeral expenses of Rs. 15,000/- that makes the total amount of compensation of Rs. 4,70,000/- less Rs. 50,000/- already paid to the claimant. The sole point of determination is answered accordingly.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - A K Choudhary - Full Document

Churia Devi vs New India Insurance Company on 23 June, 2022

In view of the settled principle of law in the case of Kurban Ansari @ Kurvan Ali and Anr. vs. Shyam Kishore Murmu and Anr. (supra), this Court has no hesitation in holding that the appropriate notional income should be Rs. 25,000/- per annum and in view of the principle of law settled in the case of Sube Singh and Anr. vs. Shyam Singh (Dead) and Others (supra) and also in the case of Kurban Ansari @ Kurvan Ali and Anr. vs. Shyam Kishore Murmu and Anr. (supra), the multiplier should be 15 depending upon the age of the deceased and not on the age of the claimant and further the claimant is entitled to filial consortium to Rs. 40,000/- and funeral expenses of Rs. 15,000/-, that makes the total amount Rs. 4,30,000/-, less Rs. 50,000/-, already paid to the claimant. The sole point of determination is answered accordingly.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - A K Choudhary - Full Document

Jimdar Sundi vs (1) Bir Singh Sundi Son Of Late Sagar ... on 28 June, 2022

10. So far as first point for determination is concerned, in view of the 4 M.A.No.112 of 2010 settled principle of law as has been held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Kurvan Ansari @ Kurvan Ali Vs. Shyam Kishore Murmu (supra), this Court has no hesitation in holding that the appropriate notional income should be Rs.25,000/- per annum and in view of the principle of law settled in the case of Sube Singh and Anr. vs. Shyam Singh (Dead) and Others (supra) and also in the case of Kurvan Ansari @ Kurvan Ali & Another Vs. Shyam Kishore Murmu & Another (supra), the multiplier should be 15 depending upon the age of the deceased and not on the age of the claimant and further the claimant is entitled to filial consortium of Rs. (40,000/- x 2) = Rs.80,000/- and funeral expenses of Rs.15,000/-, that makes the total amount of compensation to Rs.4,70,000/-, less the amount, if any, already paid to the claimant. The first point for determination is answered accordingly.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - A K Choudhary - Full Document

Roopabai vs Ramachandra Nayak on 15 April, 2023

9. Heard arguments and perused the materials on record. The counsel for the petitioners has relied upon decisions as follows; 1) (2018) 9 SCC 650: Shmanna & Ors., Vs. Divisional Manger, Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd., 2) (2018) 3 SCC 208: Pappu & Ors., Vs. Vinod Kumar Lamba & Anr., 3) Civil Appeal No.6902/2021 (Arising out of special leave petition (C) No.5311 of 2019): Kurvan Ansari Alias Kumar Ali & Anr., Vs. Shyam Kishore Murmu & Anr.. The counsel for the respondent No.1 has relied upon decisions as follows; 1)(2018) 3 SCC 208: Pappu & Ors., Vs. Vinod Kumar Lamba & Anr., 2) Civil Appeal No.6902/2021 (Arising out of special leave petition (C) No.5311 of 2019): Kurvan Ansari Alias Kumar Ali & Anr., Vs. Shyam Kishore Murmu & Anr., 3) C.M.A.(MD) No.211 of 2018: Madras High Court; Thanikodi Vs. Parameswari & Ors..
Bangalore District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Somu Damodara Rao vs Doredla Satyam on 11 February, 2026

27. Further, the Hon‟ble Apex Court in Meena Devi vs. Nunu Chand mahto alias Nemchand Mahto & Others15, while referring to Kurvan Ansari Alias Kuran Ali and Another vs. Shyam Kishore Murmu and another (14 supra) case adopted more income than fixed in the II schedule in the Motor Vehicles Act in a case filed in terms of Section 163-A of M.V.Act, at para Nos. Nos.14 and 15 of the judgment.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pradipbhai Labhubhai Dangar vs Balwantsinh Harisinh Solanki on 11 August, 2023

The Hon'ble Apex Court after applying the ratio laid down in Kurvan Ansari @ Kurvan Ali & Another (supra), and the principle laid down in Kishan Gopal and Another (supra), accepting the notional earning of Rs.30,000/-, including the future prospect and by applying the multiplier 15, in view of the decision in Sarla Verma (supra), assessed the loss of dependency as Rs.4,50,000/-, and further Rs.50,000/- was added in conventional head, and, thus total compensation of Rs.5,00,000/- was granted.
Gujarat High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - G Gopi - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next