Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 23 (0.54 seconds)
Documents citing The State Of Punjab vs Jaswinder Singh on 6 June, 2017

Wearwell (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs . Umesh on 7 August, 2020

9. Ld. Counsel on behalf of the appellant/Management has challenged the impugned judgment on the ground that the arrears of wages during the termination period cannot be granted unless there is a specific order for payment of arrears of wages at the time of directing the reinstatement of workman. It has been argued that the settlement clearly provided that all the claims, disputes of the claimant stood settled and it nowhere stated about providing the full back wages. Ld. Counsel for the appellant/Management has relied on the Judgments in Codialabail Press vs. Monappa (K) (1963) 1LLJ 638; State of Punjab vs. Jaswinder Singh (2017) 8 SCC 621 & Singh Engineering Works Private Limited vs. Kandhai & Others (Civil Revision No. 1015/1972) decided on 05.01.1975. It has been further argued that though the Authority under the Payment of Wages Act may look at the incidental matters and even record the evidence, but it cannot question whether the employer had bonafidely or wrongly terminated the relationship of employee and employer. The only question that could have been looked into whether the payment of wages has been in terms of the settlement.
Delhi District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Wearwell (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs . Manoj Kumar on 7 August, 2020

9. Ld. Counsel on behalf of the appellant/Management has challenged the impugned judgment on the ground that the arrears of wages during the termination period cannot be granted unless there is a specific order for payment of arrears of wages at the time of directing the reinstatement of workman. It has been argued that the settlement clearly provided that all the claims, disputes of the claimant stood settled and it nowhere stated about providing the full back wages. Ld. Counsel for the appellant/Management has relied on the Judgments in Codialabail Press vs. Monappa (K) (1963) 1LLJ 638; State of Punjab vs. Jaswinder Singh (2017) 8 SCC 621 & Singh Engineering Works Private Limited vs. Kandhai & Others (Civil Revision No. 1015/1972) decided on 05.01.1975. It has been further argued that though the Authority under the Payment of Wages Act may look at the incidental matters and even record the evidence, but it cannot question whether the employer had bonafidely or wrongly terminated the relationship of employee and employer. The only question that could have been looked into whether the payment of wages has been in terms of the settlement.
Delhi District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Wearwell (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs . Falam Ahmed on 7 August, 2020

9. Ld. Counsel on behalf of the appellant/Management has challenged the impugned judgment on the ground that the arrears of wages during the termination period cannot be granted unless there is a specific order for payment of arrears of wages at the time of directing the reinstatement of workman. It has been argued that the settlement clearly provided that all the claims, disputes of the claimant stood settled and it nowhere stated about providing the full back wages. Ld. Counsel for the appellant/Management has relied on the Judgments in Codialabail Press vs. Monappa (K) (1963) 1LLJ 638; State of Punjab vs. Jaswinder Singh (2017) 8 SCC 621 & Singh Engineering Works Private Limited vs. Kandhai & Others (Civil Revision No. 1015/1972) decided on 05.01.1975. It has been further argued that though the Authority under the Payment of Wages Act may look at the incidental matters and even record the evidence, but it cannot question whether the employer had bonafidely or wrongly terminated the relationship of employee and employer. The only question that could have been looked into whether the payment of wages has been in terms of the settlement.
Delhi District Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Wearwell (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs . Gyanender Kumar Pandey on 7 August, 2020

9. Ld. Counsel on behalf of the appellant/Management has challenged the impugned judgment on the ground that the arrears of wages during the termination period cannot be granted unless there is a specific order for payment of arrears of wages at the time of directing the reinstatement of workman. It has been argued that the settlement clearly provided that all the claims, disputes of the claimant stood settled and it nowhere stated about providing the full back wages. Ld. Counsel for the appellant/Management has relied on the Judgments in Codialabail Press vs. Monappa (K) (1963) 1LLJ 638; State of Punjab vs. Jaswinder Singh (2017) 8 SCC 621 & Singh Engineering Works Private Limited vs. Kandhai & Others (Civil Revision No. 1015/1972) decided on 05.01.1975. It has been further argued that though the Authority under the Payment of Wages Act may look at the incidental matters and even record the evidence, but it cannot question whether the employer had bonafidely or wrongly terminated the relationship of employee and employer. The only question that could have been looked into whether the payment of wages has been in terms of the settlement.
Delhi District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Wearwell (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs . Mohd. Nizam on 7 August, 2020

9. Ld. Counsel on behalf of the appellant/Management has challenged the impugned judgment on the ground that the arrears of wages during the termination period cannot be granted unless there is a specific order for payment of arrears of wages at the time of directing the reinstatement of workman. It has been argued that the settlement clearly provided that all the claims, disputes of the claimant stood settled and it nowhere stated about providing the full back wages. Ld. Counsel for the appellant/Management has relied on the Judgments in Codialabail Press vs. Monappa (K) (1963) 1LLJ 638; State of Punjab vs. Jaswinder Singh (2017) 8 SCC 621 & Singh Engineering Works Private Limited vs. Kandhai & Others (Civil Revision No. 1015/1972) decided on 05.01.1975. It has been further argued that though the Authority under the Payment of Wages Act may look at the incidental matters and even record the evidence, but it cannot question whether the employer had bonafidely or wrongly terminated the relationship of employee and employer. The only question that could have been looked into whether the payment of wages has been in terms of the settlement.
Delhi District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Wearwell (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs . Dharmender Kumar Tanti on 7 August, 2020

9. Ld. Counsel on behalf of the appellant/Management has challenged the impugned judgment on the ground that the arrears of wages during the termination period cannot be granted unless there is a specific order for payment of arrears of wages at the time of directing the reinstatement of workman. It has been argued that the settlement clearly provided that all the claims, disputes of the claimant stood settled and it nowhere stated about providing the full back wages. Ld. Counsel for the appellant/Management has relied on the Judgments in Codialabail Press vs. Monappa (K) (1963) 1LLJ 638; State of Punjab vs. Jaswinder Singh (2017) 8 SCC 621 & Singh Engineering Works Private Limited vs. Kandhai & Others (Civil Revision No. 1015/1972) decided on 05.01.1975. It has been further argued that though the Authority under the Payment of Wages Act may look at the incidental matters and even record the evidence, but it cannot question whether the employer had bonafidely or wrongly terminated the relationship of employee and employer. The only question that could have been looked into whether the payment of wages has been in terms of the settlement.
Delhi District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Wearwell (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs . Vinod Pal on 7 August, 2020

9. Ld. Counsel on behalf of the appellant/Management has challenged the impugned judgment on the ground that the arrears of wages during the termination period cannot be granted unless there is a specific order for payment of arrears of wages at the time of directing the reinstatement of workman. It has been argued that the settlement clearly provided that all the claims, disputes of the claimant stood settled and it nowhere stated about providing the full back wages. Ld. Counsel for the appellant/Management has relied on the Judgments in Codialabail Press vs. Monappa (K) (1963) 1LLJ 638; State of Punjab vs. Jaswinder Singh (2017) 8 SCC 621 & Singh Engineering Works Private Limited vs. Kandhai & Others (Civil Revision No. 1015/1972) decided on 05.01.1975. It has been further argued that though the Authority under the Payment of Wages Act may look at the incidental matters and even record the evidence, but it cannot question whether the employer had bonafidely or wrongly terminated the relationship of employee and employer. The only question that could have been looked into whether the payment of wages has been in terms of the settlement.
Delhi District Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Wearwell (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs . Ravi Kumar Yadav on 7 August, 2020

9. Ld. Counsel on behalf of the appellant/Management has challenged the impugned judgment on the ground that the arrears of wages during the termination period cannot be granted unless there is a specific order for payment of arrears of wages at the time of directing the reinstatement of workman. It has been argued that the settlement clearly provided that all the claims, disputes of the claimant stood settled and it nowhere stated about providing the full back wages. Ld. Counsel for the appellant/Management has relied on the Judgments in Codialabail Press vs. Monappa (K) (1963) 1LLJ 638; State of Punjab vs. Jaswinder Singh (2017) 8 SCC 621 & Singh Engineering Works Private Limited vs. Kandhai & Others (Civil Revision No. 1015/1972) decided on 05.01.1975. It has been further argued that though the Authority under the Payment of Wages Act may look at the incidental matters and even record the evidence, but it cannot question whether the employer had bonafidely or wrongly terminated the relationship of employee and employer. The only question that could have been looked into whether the payment of wages has been in terms of the settlement.
Delhi District Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Wearwell (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs . Samsul Haq on 7 August, 2020

9. Ld. Counsel on behalf of the appellant/Management has challenged the impugned judgment on the ground that the arrears of wages during the termination period cannot be granted unless there is a specific order for payment of arrears of wages at the time of directing the reinstatement of workman. It has been argued that the settlement clearly provided that all the claims, disputes of the claimant stood settled and it nowhere stated about providing the full back wages. Ld. Counsel for the appellant/Management has relied on the Judgments in Codialabail Press vs. Monappa (K) (1963) 1LLJ 638; State of Punjab vs. Jaswinder Singh (2017) 8 SCC 621 & Singh Engineering Works Private Limited vs. Kandhai & Others (Civil Revision No. 1015/1972) decided on 05.01.1975. It has been further argued that though the Authority under the Payment of Wages Act may look at the incidental matters and even record the evidence, but it cannot question whether the employer had bonafidely or wrongly terminated the relationship of employee and employer. The only question that could have been looked into whether the payment of wages has been in terms of the settlement.
Delhi District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Wearwell (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs . Anchal Singh on 7 August, 2020

9. Ld. Counsel on behalf of the appellant/Management has challenged the impugned judgment on the ground that the arrears of wages during the termination period cannot be granted unless there is a specific order for payment of arrears of wages at the time of directing the reinstatement of workman. It has been argued that the settlement clearly provided that all the claims, disputes of the claimant stood settled and it nowhere stated about providing the full back wages. Ld. Counsel for the appellant/Management has relied on the Judgments in Codialabail Press vs. Monappa (K) (1963) 1LLJ 638; State of Punjab vs. Jaswinder Singh (2017) 8 SCC 621 & Singh Engineering Works Private Limited vs. Kandhai & Others (Civil Revision No. 1015/1972) decided on 05.01.1975. It has been further argued that though the Authority under the Payment of Wages Act may look at the incidental matters and even record the evidence, but it cannot question whether the employer had bonafidely or wrongly terminated the relationship of employee and employer. The only question that could have been looked into whether the payment of wages has been in terms of the settlement.
Delhi District Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next