Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.46 seconds)
Documents citing Dasa Singh And Anr. vs Jasmer Singh on 13 December, 2002

Mahesh Agarwal And Ors vs Umesh Agarwal And Ors on 14 December, 2020

To fortify these arguments, reliance was placed on Bhagwan Singh vs. 6 State of Punjab ; Venkatlal Baldeoji Mahajan vs. Kanhiyalal Jankidas 7 and Others ; Biswanath Prasad and Others vs. Dwarka Prasad and 8 Others ; Smt. Jai Shree Lalla vs. Sri Harbans Singh9; Karam Kapahi and Others vs. Lal Chand Public Charitable Trust and Another10; Suzuki Parasrampuria Suitings Private Limited vs. Official Liquidator of 11 Mahendra Petrochemicals Limited (In Liquidation) and Others and Dasa Singh and Another vs. Jasmer Singh12.
Sikkim High Court Cites 52 - Cited by 0 - M M Rai - Full Document

Umesh Agarwal & Ors vs Mahesh Agarwal And Ors on 6 August, 2013

AIR 1960 Bombay 153; the judgments of the Supreme Court in (i) Uttam Singh Dugal & Co. Ltd. Vs. Union Bank of India & ors. : AIR 2000 SC 2740, (ii) Mudigowda Gowdappa Sankh & ors. vs. Pamchandra Revgowda Sankh (Dead) by his Legal representatives & anr. : AIR 1969 SC 1076, (iii) Charanjit Lal Mehra & ors. vs. Smt. Kamal Saroj Mahajan & anr, : AIR 2005 SC 2765; the judgments of the Punjab & Haryana High Court in (i) Dasa Singh vs. Jasmer Singh : 2003 (2) R.C.R. (Civil) 361, (ii) Smt. Surjit Kaur vs. Gurcharan Singh : Air 1973 P&H 18; the judgments of the Rajasthan High Court in (i) Chinnilal vs. Kalu & ors. :
Sikkim High Court Cites 43 - Cited by 1 - P C Kuriakose - Full Document

Kumari Maneet vs Nafe Singh ( Now Deceased) And Ors on 15 July, 2019

Learned counsel contends that both the courts below have failed to appreciate that respondent No.2, while getting transfer the suit land, filed a suit for declaration against her grand-father-Nafe Singh, in which, he categorically admitted coparcenary character of the suit property. Even otherwise, there was ample evidence on record that original owner of the suit property was Chandgi, from whom, the property had devolved upon Nafe Singh and from Nafe Singh to respondent No.2. Thus, it had acquired "ancestral character". Both the courts below have further failed to appreciate that respondent No.2, while appearing in the witness-box as DW-2, specifically admitted "coparcenary character" of the suit property. He has placed reliance upon judgment of this Court titled as "Dasa Singh vs. Jasmer Singh", 2003(2) Civil Court Cases 372 (P&H).
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - R K Jain - Full Document

Ratna Through His Lrs. Sube Singh & Ors vs Dharam Pal & Ors on 8 August, 2016

In support of his aforementioned contention, he relies upon the judgments rendered by this Court in Bhagmal vs. Surji alias Surji Kaur and others 2011 (1) CivCC 542; Smt. Kamla Devi vs. Smt. Gainda Devi and others 2008 (62) AIC 636; Dasa Singh and another vs. Jasmer Singh 2003(2) R.C.R. (Civil) 361 and Ranji Bajaj and others vs. Ram Piari 2006(1) R.C.R. (Civil) 153.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - A Rawal - Full Document
1