Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.35 seconds)
Documents citing Institute Of Laparoscopic Surgery, ... vs Bimal Kumar Ghosh on 30 May, 2007

Shahnawaz vs Dr. Ajay Kumar And Another on 30 July, 2012

In the case of Institute of Laparoscopic Surgery, Jeevan Satya and another Vs. Bimal Kumar Ghosh; I (2008) CPJ 470 (NC), the permission for cross-examination of witness was declined and the application was dismissed by the State Commission. The interrogatories for the purpose of cross-examination were served by the opposite party and the same were replied by witness. It was held by the Hon'ble National Commission that no interference is required in the impugned order and the revision petition was dismissed.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited vs Capt. D.N. Badoni on 14 May, 2013

Learned counsel for the revisionist cited another decision of the Hon'ble National Commission rendered in the case of Institute of 3 Laparoscopic Surgery, Jeevan Satya and another Vs. Bimal Kumar Ghosh; I (2008) CPJ 470 (NC). In the said case, the permission for cross-examination of witness was declined and the application was dismissed by the State Commission. The interrogatories for purpose of cross-examination were served by the opposite party and the same were replied by witness. It was held by the Hon'ble National Commission that no interference is required in the impugned order and the revision petition was dismissed.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Saeed Ahmed vs Shivcharan Singh Bhandari on 27 April, 2012

In the case of Institute of Laparoscopic Surgery, Jeevan Satya and another Vs. Bimal Kumar Ghosh; I (2008) CPJ 470 (NC), the permission for cross-examination of witness was declined and the application was dismissed by the State Commission. The interrogatories for purpose of cross-examination were served by the opposite party and the same were replied by witness. It was held by the Hon'ble National Commission that no interference is required in the impugned order and the revision petition was dismissed.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 5 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1