citedby: 118715670

Vijay Kumar (Deceased) Through His Lrs ... vs Kamlesh And Others on 13 October, 2023

30. Similarly, it was laid down in Raj Kumar v. Rohtash, 2010 SCC OnLine P&H 13225 that the Power of Attorney has to be construed strictly and when authority was given to deal with the .

Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 45 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vijay Kumar (Deceased) Through His Lrs ... vs Kamlesh And Others on 13 October, 2023

28. Similarly, it was laid down in Raj Kumar v. Rohtash, 2010 SCC OnLine P&H 13225 that the Power of Attorney has to be construed strictly and when authority was given to deal with the property, the holder does not have any right to create tenancy.

Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 43 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajesh (Deceased) Thr Lrs vs Balwan Singh (Deceased) Thr Lrs And Ors on 13 May, 2019

In support of contention, relied upon judgments passed by this Court in Raj Kumar Vs. Rohtash 2010(3) PLR 187; Baldev Singh and others Vs. Sukhdev Singh and others 2006(3) RCR (Civil) 76, thus, urges this Court for dismissal of the revision petition.

Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - A Rawal - Full Document

Virat Pal & Ors vs Mam Raj & Ors on 16 November, 2010

Recently, another Single Judge of this Court in Raj Kumar & Ors. v. Rohtash & Ors., 2010(3) CCC 566 (P&H) reiterated this view.

Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 3 - K S Ahluwalia - Full Document

Sandeep Minor vs Ram Chander And Others on 6 August, 2018

In Baldev Singh vs. Sukhdev Singh, 2006(3) R.C.R. (Civil) 76; Raj Kumar vs. Rohtash, 2010(3) PLR 187 and Virat Pal and others vs. Mam Raj and others, 2011(2) PLR 250, it was held that if the guardian was not appointed as per the provisions in terms of Order 32 Rule 3 CPC, suit is liable to be dismissed as the provision is mandatory.

Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - R M Singh - Full Document

Bhoop Lal vs State Of Haryana on 8 September, 2015

Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that in view of the order passed in CRR-3988-2013 (Raj Kumar Vs. Rohtash @ Rohit and ors.), he may be granted permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh one on the same cause of action, as and when necessity arises.

Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - R S Malik - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results

Vijay Kumar (Deceased) Through His Lrs ... vs Kamlesh And Others on 13 October, 2023

Vijay Kumar (Deceased) Through His Lrs ... vs Kamlesh And Others on 13 October, 2023

Rajesh (Deceased) Thr Lrs vs Balwan Singh (Deceased) Thr Lrs And Ors on 13 May, 2019

Virat Pal & Ors vs Mam Raj & Ors on 16 November, 2010

Sandeep Minor vs Ram Chander And Others on 6 August, 2018

Bhoop Lal vs State Of Haryana on 8 September, 2015