Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.42 seconds)

Shri Om Parkash Legal Heiar Smt Pushpa ... vs Income Tax Officer Ward-1(3), ... on 31 October, 2018

Again, the period for which the liability had remained unpaid, i.e., as at the end of the relevant year, etc., are all matters of fact, again, emphasizing, if one was still necessary, that the matter as to whether a liability subsists as at the year-end or not is essentially factual, even as clarified in several decisions that have travelled to the Hon'ble higher courts of law (refer, inter alia, CIT v. Autopins India [1991] 191 ITR 161 (Del); CIT v. Jaipur Oil Products Pvt. Ltd. [1994] 206 ITR 90 (Raj); CIT v. Sea Pearl Industries [1995] 211 ITR 508 (Ker)).
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Amritsar Cites 31 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1