Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 38 (0.71 seconds)

Shekhar Bihari Lal vs The State Of Jharkhand on 10 March, 2021

In view of the above admitted position, the respondent State is directed to consider the case of the petitioner in the light of the judgment rendered by this Court in "Prashant Kumar Mishra" and "Geeta" (supra) and also L.P.A. No.22 of 2018 and L.P.A. No. 661 of 2019 and pass appropriate reasoned order within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S K Dwivedi - Full Document

Vijayendra Kumar Singh vs The State Of Jharkhand on 2 February, 2021

7. The learned counsel for the respondent State submits that the identical matters in the case of "Prashant Kumar Mishra" and "Geeta" (supra) the matter has been set at rest which was affirmed in L.P.A. No.22 of 2018 and L.P.A. No. 661/2019. It is stated that on the basis of the above mentioned judgments, the Court may dispose the instant case accordingly.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S K Dwivedi - Full Document

Ashok Kumar vs The State Of Jharkhand on 3 February, 2021

In view of the above admitted position, the respondent State is directed to consider the case of the petitioner in the light of the judgment rendered by this Court in "Prashant Kumar Mishra" and "Geeta" (supra) and also L.P.A. No.22 of 2018 and L.P.A. No. 661 of 2019 and pass appropriate reasoned order within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S K Dwivedi - Full Document

Dukhu Ram Kuiry vs The State Of Jharkhand on 8 February, 2021

In view of the above admitted position, the respondent State is directed to consider the case of the petitioners in the light of the judgment rendered by this Court in "Prashant Kumar Mishra" and "Geeta" (supra) and also L.P.A. No.22 of 2018 and L.P.A. No. 661 of 2019 and pass appropriate reasoned order within a period of 8 weeks from the date 5 of receipt/production of a copy of this order.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - S K Dwivedi - Full Document

Vijay Kant Dhar Dubey vs The State Of Jharkhand on 8 February, 2021

In view of the above admitted position, the respondent State is directed to consider the case of the petitioner in the light of the judgment rendered by this Court in "Prashant Kumar Mishra" and "Geeta" (supra) and also L.P.A. No.22 of 2018 and L.P.A. No. 661 of 2019 and pass appropriate reasoned order within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S K Dwivedi - Full Document

Asin Parwez vs The State Of Jharkhand on 8 February, 2021

In view of the above admitted position, the respondent State is directed to consider the case of the petitioner in the light of the judgment rendered by this Court in "Prashant Kumar Mishra" and "Geeta" (supra) and also L.P.A. No.22 of 2018 and L.P.A. No. 661 of 2019 and pass appropriate reasoned order within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S K Dwivedi - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next