Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.25 seconds)
Documents citing The Trustees Of Port Of Madras vs Good Year India Ltd. And Ors. on 26 July, 1972

Vadami Bai vs Shaik Hussain And Anr. on 15 March, 1979

7-B. In this case the sale was confirmed on 25th November, 1970, and a petition was filed to implead the auction purchaser on 21st October, 1971, and it was allowed on 7th February, 1972. Thus, the petition to implead her was filed within one year from the date of the confirmation of sale. the fact that it was allowed after more than one year will not make any difference. As held by the Madras High Court in Port of Madras v. Good Year India Ltd., (1973) 1 Mad Lj 296, Section 22 of the Limitation Act must be construed as meaning that the date of the application should be taken as the date when the new party was impleaded.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Indira Devaraj Bhat vs S.Srinivas on 7 June, 2007

18. The learned counsel for the appellant referred to Trustees, Port of Madras vs. Good Year India (AIR 1973 Madras 316) and Ram Singh vs. Khirodhan Devi (AIR 1983 Patna 151), to show that new pleas cannot be entertained at the appellate stage, when there are no pleadings in the written statement. To this, the learned Senior Counsel and the other learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent would submit when the irregularity glares at the Court, no further evidence is required and the facts speaks for themselves, it is open to the parties to point out such vitiating factors to support their case.
Madras High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - P Sridevan - Full Document

Satish Narain Sood vs Kanchan Bala Sood & Anr. on 26 November, 2010

In the judgment of The Trustees of Port of Madras (supra) the words "when he was so made a party" appearing as appearing in Section 22 of the old Act (which is para materia Section 21 of the RSA No.61/2002 Page 4 of 6 new Act) were construed and interpreted. While interpreting the said words, the Court held that the date of the making of an application under Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code would be the date on which the party is impleaded; the date of passing of the order would not be the relevant date.
Delhi High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 1 - I Kaur - Full Document
1