Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (1.82 seconds)
Documents citing Bar Council Of Kerala vs Thankappan Pillai on 3 October, 1985

Babu Premarajan vs Superintendent Of Police, Kasaragode ... on 30 August, 2000

(iv) In view of the above, we respectfully regret our inability to agree with the reasoning contained in para 5 of the Full Bench decision in Bar Council of Kerala v. Thankappan Pillai, 1985 Ker LT 769 : (AIR 1986 Ker 1 (FB), in so far as it overrules the Division Bench decision in 1985 Ker LT 738. The observations at the end of para 5 of the Full Bench judgment to the effect, "Ajudicial order in writing and signed by the Judge is evidently not a requirement of the express language of the Section", do not, in our view, lay down the correct law. The same are, therefore, disapproved.
Kerala High Court Cites 74 - Cited by 12 - Full Document

Kallara Sukumaran vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 30 January, 1987

18. If two interpretations are possible, we should prefer that interpretation which is in accordance with law and also advances the cause of justice. If, as contended on behalf of the petitioners, the learned single Judge has referred only the question of jurisdiction to the Division Bench, it would clearly be in conflict with Section 3 of the Kerala High Court Act, as it does not empower a single Judge to refer only a question to the Division Bench. If, on the other hand, the order is considered as referring the entire cases to the Division Bench, the order of reference would not suffer from any legal infirmity. A Full Bench of this Court has in Bar Council of Kerala v. Thankappan Pillai, 1985 Ker LT 769 : (AIR 1986 Ker 1), dealing with the scope of Sections 3 and 4 of the Kerala High Court Act held in para 9 of the judgment as follows :
Kerala High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 21 - Full Document
1