Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.39 seconds)

Ranbir Singh And Ors vs State Of Haryana on 29 September, 2015

24. On the quantum of sentence learned counsel for the appellant has argued that the incident had taken place twenty years back. The purpose of criminal law justice is not only to punish erring individuals but also to reform him. Keeping in view the agony faced and the role of the appellants in the occurrence, a lenient view be taken qua the quantum of sentence. No useful purpose will be served by sending them to undergo imprisonment after twenty years of the occurrence. He has relied upon the observations made in the cases of Surjit Singh versus State of Punjab, 2008(1) RCR (Criminal) 600; Gulzar Singh & others versus State of Punjab, 1987(2) RCR (Criminal) 215; Tota Singh and others versus State of Punjab, 2003(3) AICLR 400 and Jaspal versus State of Haryana, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 16.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - S Gupta - Full Document
1