Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.28 seconds)

Ranjeet Kumar Singh vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 22 June, 2018

That being the position, this Court is not required to consider the decisions relied on by Mr. Singh in case of Raj Kumari Devi (supra), Ram Nihorasingh (supra), Ram Bachan Debey (supra) and Nagendra Narayan Prasad (supra) in support of the contention that when possession, title, right and interest had already been declared by the competent Court, proceeding under Sections 144 and 145 of the Code is barred. Though there cannot be any dispute over this legal proposition enunciated by Mr. Singh, learned Senior Counsel, since there is no declaration by a competent Court in respect of possession, right title and interest in respect of the disputed land, the said principle does not help the petitioner for getting the relief which he is seeking in the present proceeding.
Patna High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - C S Singh - Full Document

Ranjeet Kumar Singh vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 20 June, 2018

That being the position, this Court is not required to consider the decisions relied on by Mr. Singh in case of Raj Kumari Devi (supra), Ram Nihorasingh (supra), Ram Bachan Debey (supra) and Nagendra Narayan Prasad (supra) in support of the contention that when possession, title, right and interest had already been declared by the competent Court, proceeding under Sections 144 and 145 of the Code is barred. Though there cannot be any dispute over this legal proposition enunciated by Mr. Singh, learned Senior Counsel, since there is no declaration by a competent Court in respect of possession, right title and interest in respect of the disputed land, the said principle does not help the petitioner for getting the relief which he is seeking in the present proceeding.
Patna High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - C S Singh - Full Document
1