Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.30 seconds)
Documents citing South Indian Co-Operative Stores Ltd. vs Union Of India (Uoi) on 10 July, 1956

State Of West Bengal vs Union Of India (Uoi) on 24 June, 1986

But in that case we would, as pointed out in South Indian Co-operative Stores (supra) (at 987 of 60 Cal WN), have to decide whether the Traffic Superintendent, to whom the notice was addressed, was competent to waive the notice or the defects therein to effectively bind the Railway Administration by such waiver. It is, however, not necessary for us to go into that question in this case as, even assuming that the defect in the notice was so waived by the destination Railway, the suit was nevertheless to fail on the third ground pointed out hereinabove and discussed hereinbelow.
Calcutta High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Gajanan Dhanuka And Ors. vs Union Of India (Uoi) on 1 April, 1958

26. Then again in the case of South Indian Cooperative Stores Ltd. v. Union of India, , notice of claim was sent to the Chief Commercial Manager. Das Gupta and Guha, JJ. held that although the Indian Railways Act required service of notice under Section 77 in the manner laid down in Section 140 of the Act, protection under Section 77 could be waived. Proceeding further their Lordships observed :--
Calcutta High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

The Union Of India (Uoi) Owning The North ... vs Sakthi Textiles By Its Partner, K.A. ... on 7 March, 1969

5. But learned Counsel for the respondent further contended that this is a case in which it should be held that there has been a waiver of the plea of limitation, under circumstances, similar to those in South Indian Co-operative 'Stores v. Union of India , where the learned Judges came to the conclusion that there had been a waiver. It is stated that this decision has also been approved in a subsequent decision of the same High Court.
Madras High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1