Kunjamma vs Eldose on 28 May, 2012
4. Learned counsel who filed caveat on behalf of 7th
respondent contended that the plea of appellant cannot be
accepted. There is no reliable evidence to show that the
R.S.A.No.505/2012
3
acquisition under Ext.A2 was benami for and on behalf of the
appellant and placed for reliance of the decision in Aliyamma Vs.
Thomas (2006(4)KLT 106) where it is held that the mere fact that
dowry amount was utilised for the benefit of the husband's family
would not confer right on the wife to claim share in the family
property of the husband.